SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Raj) 776

V.S.KOKJE
Rajasthan Financial Corporation – Appellant
Versus
Pukhraj Jain – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
L.P. Gupta, for Petitioner

Honble KOKJE, J.–Rajasthan Financial Corporation had filed a civil suit in the court of Additional District Judge, Beawar, District Ajmer. After trial of the suit was complete and the case was reserved for judgment, an application under Order 13 Rule 2 CPC was moved by the plaintiff. This application was rejected by the trial court holding that after the arguments were heard and case was closed for judgment, the Court was not compelled to accept any application from the parties. Aggrieved by that order, the Rajasthan Financial Corporation has filed this revision petition.

(2). The only point to be decided in the case is whether a party could move an application after the final arguments in the case were heard and the case was reserved for judgment.

(3). In Arjun Singh vs. Mohindra Kumar (1) in para 19, the Supreme Court has observed as under:-

``In the present context when once the hearing starts, the Code contemplates only two stages in the trial of the suit: (1) where the hearing is adjourned or (2) where the hearing is completed. Where the hearing is completed the parties have no further rights or privilages in the matter and it is only for the convenience of the Court that O.XX R.










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top