SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Raj) 116

A.R.LAKSHMANAN, H.R.PANWAR
Heera Lal – Appellant
Versus
Board of Revenue – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
M.C. Bhoot, for Appellant Dinesh Maheshwari, for Respondents

Honble LAKSHMANAN, C.J.–The unsuccessful petitioner in the writ petition is the appellant in this appeal. The appellant filed the writ petition to quash the judgment of the Board of Revenue dated 28.6.74 (Anx. 5), and to restore the judgment of the Sub Divisional Officer, Udaipur dated 18.12.1968 (Anx. 3) and to dismiss the suit of the respondent No. 4 Shanker Lal (Plaintiff).

(2). The dispute in this appeal lies in a very narrow compass. The facts found by the courts below have not been disputed before us. Before proceeding further to deal with the facts of this case it is better to refer to the family tree.

Ganga Ram



Prithvi Raj Girdhari


Dev Kishan (Son) (petitioner No.1 in writ petition) Hira Lal (Son) (Petnr. No.2 in writ petition) Gulab (son) (Resp. No.5 in writ petition) Bhagwan(died in 1910)


Champa (widow)


Shanker Lal (adopted on 12.12.1959 for herself and to her deceased husband) (Plaintiff)

It is seen from the above family tree that Ganga Ram had three sons Prithvi Raj, Girdhari and Bhagwan. Prithvi Rajs son is Dev Kishan who is petitioner No.1-defendant No.1 in the writ petition. Girdhari had two sons, Heera Lal (petitioner No.2 in the writ petition) and Gul








































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top