M.B.SHAH, B.P.SINGH, H.K.SEMA
Union of India – Appellant
Versus
Association for Democratic Reforms – Respondent
(2). Before dealing with the aforesaid questions, we would refer to the brief facts as alleged by the Petitioner-Association for Democratic Reforms in Writ Petition No.72,57 of 1999 filed before the High Court of Delhi for direction to implement the recommendations made by the Law Commission in its 170th Report and to make necessary changes under Rule 4 of the Conduct of Election Rules, 1961. It has been pointed out that Law Commission of India had, at the request of Government of India, undertaken comprehensive study of the measures required to expedite hearing of election petitions and to have a thorough review of the Representation o
1. Vineet Narain & Ors. vs. Union of India & Anr. (1998(1) SCC 226)
2. Kihoto Hollohan vs. Zachillhu and Ors. (1992 Supp.(2) SCC 651)
3. Mohinder Singh Gill vs. The Chief Election Commissioner
4. Kanhiya Lal Omar vs. R.K. Trivedi and Ors. (1985(4) SCC 628)
5. Common Cause (A Registered Society) vs. Union of India and Ors. (1996(2) SCC 752)
6. State of Uttar Pradesh vs. Raj Narain and Ors. (1975(4) SCC 428)
9. Secretary Ministry of Information and Broadcasting
11. P.V. Narasimha Rao vs. State (CBI/SPE) (1998(4) SCC 626)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.