HARBANS LAL
Rajendra Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
(2). Briefly stated, the relevant facts necessary for the disposal of this petition are that one Sugna Ram, the then Sarpanch Gram Panchayat Patel Nagar, Tehsil Bilara made a complaint on 9.11.1996 to the Addl. S.P. ACD Cases, Jodhpur with the allegations that a Panchayat Bhawan has been got constructed under the famine relief scheme on a total cost of Rs.3,20,000/- out of which the payment of Rs.76,000/- was yet to be made and for the payment of which Shri ramesh Purohit, the then B.D.O. demanded Rs.32,000/- as bribe i.e. 10% of the total amount of Rs.3,20,000/-. After verifying the satisfying about the veracity the truth of the allegations, a trap was arranged and after the successful trap a case FIR No.253/96 was registered against the petitioner for the offences under Section 7, 13(1)(d)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (hereinafter referred t
5. State vs. Shanker Bhaurao Khirode (AIR 1959 Bom 437 - V 46 C 129)
2. Satya Narain Sharma vs. State of Rajasthan (AIR 2001 SC 2856).–Distinguished.
3. Ramchandra Keshava Adke (Dead) by L.Rs. vs. Govind Joti Chavare & Ors. (AIR 1975 SC 915)
6. Kanta Prasad vs. Delhi Administration (AIR 1958 SC 350)
4. State (Delhi Administration) vs. Jagjit Singh (1989 Supp. (2) SCC 770)
1. A. Devendran vs. State of T.N. ((1997) 11 SCC 720).–Followed.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.