SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Raj) 276

HARBANS LAL
Vishnu Iron & Steel Industries – Appellant
Versus
Govind Ram – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mahendra Goyal, for Appellant R.P. Garg, for Respondent

Honble HARBANS LAL, J.–This civil second appeal under Order 42 Rule 1 r/w Section 100 CPC is directed against the judgment and decree dated 4.4.2002 passed by the learned Addl. Distt. Judge No.3, Ajmer in Civil Regular Appeal No. 12/02 whereby the appeal has been dismissed and the judgment and decree dated 8.12.1987 passed by the learned Munsiff (East), Ajmer city in COS No. 476/75 has been confirmed.

(2). Briefly stated the relevant facts necessary for the decision of this appeal are that the plaintiff respondent filed a suit for eviction and arrears of rent against the appellant-defendant on twin grounds of default in payment of rent and subletting of suit premises without the permission and consent of the plaintiff. The appellant-defendant contested the suit by filing a written statement denying all the averments made in the plaint and further pleading that the premise let out comprised of three rooms and two `tibaras and not two room and two `tibaras as pleaded by the plaintiff. It was also pleaded that monthly rent of Rs. 85/- was inclusive of electricity and water charges. There was no default in payment of rent. The premises were sub-let with the permission and consent of the












































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top