Rajasthan High Court
Honble M.R. CALLA & N.P. GUPTA, JJ.
State of Rajasthan & Others - Appellant
Versus
Vijay Shanti Educational Trust, 4th Floor, 3 Blackers Road, Chennai - Respondents
D.B. Civil Special Appeal (W) No. 58 of 2001
Decided On : September 21, 2001
The rights under Articles 29 and 30 were claimed mostly by Muslims, Christians and Jews, etc., but now such rights are being claimed by followers of other communities also who claim to profess a separate and distinct faith or religion, although they all are essentially and basically Hindus. A stage has reached when the Legislature will have to thin over as to what definite mode or uniform standards have to be prescribed for conferring or giving the minority status and lay down definite norms in this regard. So far as the Courts are concerned, the judicial process cannot be made use of to claim to the benefit of Articles 29 and 30 and to capitalise the following of a particular ideology in contradistinction to the main and basis concept when has been flowing from Indian origin and cultural heritage and judicial process cannot be used to capitalise the benefit of Articles 29 and 30 of the Constitution of India. We are bound by the provisions of the Constitution. It is for the Legislature to think as to how to deal with this problem. (Para 55 & 56)
(2). The original petition had been filed by Vijay Shanti Educational Trust, Chennai, against the respondents - State of Rajasthan through the Secretary, Medical and Health Department, Government of Rajasthan; the Secretary, Home Department, Government of Rajasthan, and the Rajasthan Minorities Commission, on 4th of August, 2000, seeking a declaration that the orders dated 1.8.2000 (Annex. 16) and 3.8.2000 (Annex. 17) with the petition, be declared to by illegal and be quashed, with consequential benefits to the petitioner and by an appropriate writ, order or direction, it may be declared that the Jain community is a religious minority i the State of Rajasthan and is entitled to exercise its right conferred by Article 30 of the Construction of India and further, that the respondents be directed to permit the petitioner to grant admission to BDS Course form Academic Session 2000-2001 against 50 % management quota in exercise of its rights as an Institution run by the religious minority and the respondents be restrained from interfering with the exercise of rights of the petitioner in the matter of admission so far as the management quota (to the extent of 50% of the seats) of a religious minority institution is concerned.
(3). The petitioner claims to be a Charitable Trust, formed by Shri V.C. Jain with Sarva Shri Suresh Kumar Jain, Chandra Kumar Jain and Naresh Kumar Jain as the Trustees. The trust deed dated 24.02.1999 has been placed on record as Annex. 1. The petitioner further claims that the petitioner - trust, which will be hereinafter referred to as `the Trust, had been created, inter alia, with the object to establish, support, upgrade, maintain, run and/or grant aid and other financial assistance to the schools, Vidhya mandirs, colleges, technical institutes, universities, libraries, reading rooms, hostels, boarding houses, laboratories etc. and to develop and advance education and diffusion of knowledge amongst the public in general. One of the objects of the petitioner Trust is that it will be established and maintained by the members of the Jain Community for charitable purposes. The petitioner Trust has been named `Vijay Shanti which is the name of famous Jain Saint Acharya Vijay Shanti Surishwar Ji. The name of the Dental College at Udaipur is also in the name of Jain Saint Acharya Darshan Sagar Ji and the Trust therefore, claims to be an Institute established and administered by religious minority.
(4). It has further been stated that Shri V.C.Jain, who has created this Trust, had already created two Trusts for charitable educational purposes in the city of Chennai. The names of these Trusts are Shri Educational Trust. It has been stated that these Trusts are actively working in Chennai for advancement of its objects and are running the educational institutions at Chennai in the names of Shri Chandra Prabhu Jain College, Shri Guru Shanti Womens College and Shri Guru Shanti Higher Secondary School and that all these institutions are for charitable purposes. It has been then stated that Shri V.C. Jain, being of Rajasthan origin, decided to establish educational institution in Rajasthan and, therefore, created this Trust. After creation of this Trust, the land measuring 10 Bighas was purchased at Udaipur for establishment of a Dental College and a Dental Hospital attached to it. After completing the request formalities, the petitioner Trust has also constructed building for college and hospital, the total constructed area measuring 50,000 square feet. By this time, the petitioner has opens Rs. 3 Crores approximately in t
2. Andhra Kesari Educational Society vs. State (AIR 1988 AP 256)
10. Yagvapurushdasji vs. Mooldas (AIR 1966 SC 1119)–Followed.
1. C. Salmuel vs. District Educational Officer (AIR 1982 A.P. 64)–Relied on.
3. Shiva Nand Pandey vs. Bhagwan Das Harlalka (AIR 1999 Cal. 321)–Relied on.
7. St. Stephens College vs. University of Delhi (1992) 1 SCC 558)
8. T.M.A. Pai Foundation (II) vs. State of Karnataka (1993) 4 SCC 286)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.