SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(Cal) 290

S.B.SINHA, S.N.BHATTACHARJEE
SHIVA NAND PANDEY – Appellant
Versus
BHAGWAN DAS HARLALKA – Respondent


SATYABRATA SINHA, J.

( 1 ) THESE appeals raise a question as to whether only because a school has been established allegedly by some Hindi speaking people, they as of right, can claim minority status with a view to get protection under Art. 29 and/or Art. 30 of the Constitution of India.

( 2 ) F. M. A. No. 742 of 1987 arises out of a judgment and order dated 4-7-1985 passed in Civil Rule No. 15274 (W) of 1984 whereby and whereunder the writ petition filed by the 1st respondent herein was allowed.

( 3 ) M. A. T. Nos. 4040 of 1998 and 4099 of 1998 have been filed by the teacher in-charge and the members of the Managing Committee of the school in question known as Anglo Hindi High School against an interim order dated 25th November, 1998 passed by a learned single Judge of this Court whereby and whereunder an order of injunction in terms of prayer (f) and (g) the writ application was granted, inter alia, on the ground that this Court in a decision dated 4th July, 1985 (Bhagwandas Haralalka v. State of West Bengal, reported in (1986) 1 Cal LJ 293 declared the school to be a minority institution and, thus, is entitled to appoint its own Head Master in view of the decision of the Apex






















































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top