A.C.GOYAL
Girraj Prasad – Appellant
Versus
Rishikesh – Respondent
(2). The plaintiff Sh. Jamnadas filed a civil suit for arrears of rent and eviction on 16.9.1976 against the defendant-tenant Sh. Kesar Lal with the averments that two shops and one `Kotha were let-out to the defendant on 9.2.1951 on monthly rent of Rs. 35/-. On account of default in payment of rent and reasonable and bonafide requirement for the plaintiffs son Rajendra Kumar, the plaintiff had filed a civil suit No. 19/1969 for arrears of rent and eviction. The defendant in that civil suit filed an application under Section 13-A of the Rajasthan Premises (Control of Rent & Eviction) Act, 1950 (in short the Act). That application was decided on 31.10.1975. The defendant having complied with that order got the benefit of the first default. The defendant, thereafter did not pay the rent for November, 1975 to August, 1976 and thus committed second default. Th
4. Bal Kishan vs. Om Prakash and Another (AIR 1986 SC 1952)
14. Bhanwar Lal vs. Smt. Chandra Kanta (RLW 1970 page 464)
2. Nihalchand vs. Noratmal (RLW 1965 page 197)
9. Shiv Dutt Jadiya vs. Ganga Devi (A.I.R. 2002 Supreme Court 1163)
10. Kuldeep Singh vs. Ganpat Lal and Another (A.I.R. 1996 Supreme Court 729)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.