2005 Supreme(Raj) 454
N.N.MATHUR, SUNIL KUMAR GARG
Emarata Ram Pooniya – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
Advocates Appeared:
M. Mridul, Senior Advocate, with Suchita Bachhawat, M.R. Singhvi, M.S. Singhvi, Pushpendar Singh & Kuldeep Mathur, for Appellants N.M. Lodha, Additional Advocate General & N.R. Choudhary, for Caveator
Honble MATHUR, J.–The appellants by way of separate writ petitions challenged the process of selection on the post of Teachers Gr.II/Senior Teachers, pursuant to the zone-wise advertisements viz; Jaipur, Jodhpur, Kota, Udaipur, Ajmer & Churu. The respondents after due consideration of merit in accordance with the prescribed procedure, issued provisional merit list of 5712 candidates on 19th September 2003. On coming to know of the result, out of thousands of unsuccessful candidates, few of them in total 9 writ petitions under Article 226 came to be filed in October 2003, challenging the process of selection, on diverse grounds. The learned Single Judge dismissed all the writ petitions by impugned judgment dated 4.11.2004 mainly on the ground that no interference is warranted with the selections made on the basis of practice in vogue for long time, more particularly at the instance of the candidates, who have taken a chance and participated in the selection process. Learned Single Judge partly allowed the writ petition being S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5709/2003 ``Dharamveer vs. State and directed the respondent-State to exclude candidates from consideration possessing the Degree f
Click Here to Read the rest of this document