SHIV KUMAR SHARMA
Syed Hasan Ali – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
(2). For convenience facts of Writ Petition No. 7957 of 2005 are taken into consideration. The petitioner is this writ petition averred that land bearing Khasra No. 1333 and 604 was purchased by him in the year 1987 by a registered sale deed. The Tehsildar vide order dated September 1, 1987 mutated the said land in favour of the petitioner and vide permission April 24, 1990 the petitioner constructed a residential house, well and boundary wall of 5 ft. around the whole land. The State of Rajasthan issued a Notification dated July 1, 2005 under Section 4 of the Acquisition Act acquiring the land of the khatedars in village Kukas for the purposes of Rajasthan Industrial Development and Investment Corporation Ltd. (in short RIICO). The land of the petitioner proposed to be acquired was 0.52 hectares out of total area of 0.84 hectares
Raja Anand Brahme Shah vs. State of UP (AIR 1967 SC 1081) 20
Commissioner of Police Bombay vs. Goverdhan Das Bhanji (AIR 1952 SC 16) 33
Rajasthan Housing Board vs. Shri Kishan (1993 (2) SCC 84) 16
First Land Acquisition Collector vs. Nirodhi Prakash Ganguli (2002) 4 SCC 160) 17
U.O.I. vs. Ghanshyam Das Khedia (1996) 2 SCC 285) 18
Chameli Singh vs. State of UP (1996) 2 SCC 549) 19
Bhagat Singh vs. State of U.P. (1999) 2 SCC 384) 21
Jai Narain vs. Union of India (1996) 1 SCC 9) 22
State of U.P. vs. Smt. Pista Devi (1986) 4 SCC 251) 23
Union of India vs. Deepak Bhardwaj (AIR 2004 SC 3289) 25
Om Prakash vs. State of U.P. (AIR 1998 SC 2504) 26
Union of India vs. Mukesh Hans (2004) 8 SCC 14) 27
Union of India vs. Krishan Lal Arneja (2004) 8 SCC 453) 28
Narain Govind Gavate vs. State of Maharashtra (1977) 1 SCC 133) 29
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.