Honble ASOPA, J.–By the instant writ petition, the petitioner has initially challenged the selection of respondent No.3 & 4 (Dr. Sudhir Mehta & Dr. Rajiv Bagarhatta) against the vacancies of the year 1990-91 for the post of Lecturer in General Medicine and to direct the respondent Rajasthan Public Service Commission to accordingly amend the result of the selection of the year 1990-91. The petitioner has further sought consequential direction of appointment to the said post against the year 1990- 91 with seniority.

(2). The facts in brief of the case are that the petitioner has filed the present writ petition initially challenging the eligibility of Dr. Sudhir Mehta and Dr. Rajiv Bagarhatta (respondent No.3 & 4 in the original writ petition) on the ground that these two private respondents were not eligible for appointment against the vacancies of the year 1990-91 to the post of Lecturer (General Medicine) on account of not completing the post-graduation degree i.e. M.D. in General Medicine upto 1.4.1990. Subsequently, an application was filed on 8.5.2006 for deleting the names of Dr. Rajiv Bagarhatta - respondent No.4, Dr. S.K. Sharma - respondent No.5 and Dr. Shiv Charan Jelia - re

Click Here to Read the rest of this document