S.B.SINHA, MARKANDEY KATJU
Francis Stanly alias Stalin – Appellant
Versus
Intelligence Officer, Narcotic Control Bureau, Thiruvananthapuram – Respondent
(2). Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.
(3). The appellant was accused No. 2 in the criminal case under the NDPS Act with which we are concerned.
(4). The prosecution case briefly stated is that on 1.10.2000 at 3.45 P.M., PW7, Radhesh, Intelligence Officer, received information that one person was standing in the parking area between Gandhi Park and Pattomthanu Pillai Park at East Fort, Thiruvananthapuram waiting for somebody to dispose of about one kilogram of heroin which was in his possession. PW7 recorded the information and submitted Ext. P10 report to PW5, the Superintendent, Narcotic Control Bureau Regional Intelligence Unit, Thiruvananthapuram. PW7 alongwith the informant proceeded to the place where the 1st accused was waiting and the 1st accused was shown to PW7 by the informant. PW5 alongwith PW4 and PW6 reached near Pattomthanu Pillai Park about 4.30 P.M. and PW7 pointed out the 1st accused to them. PWs 4, 5 and 6 alongwith the witnesses approached the accused who was holding M.O. 2 (a) bag. PWs 4 t
Suresh Chandra Bahri vs. State of Bihar (AIR 1994 SC 2420.) 10
Piara Singh vs. State of Punjab (1969) 3 SCR 236) 8
M. Prabhulal vs. Assistant Director
T. Thomson vs. State of Kerala and another (2002) 9 SCC 618) 12
State (NCT of Delhi) vs. Navjot Sandhu @ Afasan Guru (2005) 11 SCC 600) 13
Raj Kumar Karwal vs. Union of India and others (1990) 2 SCC 409) 14
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.