ALTAMAS KABIR, CYRIAC JOSEPH
RRavindra Reddy – Appellant
Versus
HRamaiah Reddy – Respondent
2. After Appanna Reddy’s death Pilla Reddy and H. Ramaiah Reddy constituted a joint family in respect of the ancestral properties and were in joint possession and enjoyment of the various properties, including the suit schedule properties.
3. In 1972, there was a partition of the properties between Pilla Reddy and his son, H. Ramaiah Reddy, in respect of the joint family and ancestral properties. One Annaiah Reddy, a professional document writer at the Sub-Registrar’s office at Anekal Taluk, was an attesting witness to the registered partition deed. Pilla Reddy executed two Wills, both scribed by Annaiah Reddy, in 1972 and in 1979. The said Annaiah Reddy filed an application on 30th December, 1974, for grant of tenancy rights in respect of the suit schedule lands under Section 48 of the Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961, hereinafte
Saraswati & Ors. vs. Lachanna ((1994) 1 SCC 611)11
Shiv Kumar Chadha vs. Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors. ((1993) 3 SCC 161)12
Swamy Atmananda & Ors. vs. Sri Ramakrishna Tapovanam & Ors. ((2005) 10 SCC 51)13
Sudhir G. Angur & Ors. vs. M. Sanjeev & Ors. (2006 (1) SCC 141)14
Jatinder Singh & Anr. vs. Mehar Singh & Ors. (AIR 2009 SC 354)15
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.