ALOK SHARMA
Gordhan Lal Agarwal – Appellant
Versus
Mali Ram Modi – Respondent
2. The plaintiff filed a suit for eviction in respect of a shop stated to be let out by him to defendant, which shop was/ is situate near the bus-stand, at Neem ka Thana, Sikar. The eviction was sought on the ground of default in payment of rent by the defendant for the period July, 1994 to May, 1995 covered under Section 13 (1)(d) of the Rajasthan Premises (control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1950 (hereinafter `1950 Act') and on the ground of material alteration in tenanted premises without the consent of the landlord under Section 13(1)(c) of the 1950 Act.
3. Routine as it is, the suit was defended on all counts by the defendant a
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.