SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(RAJ) 121

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
Mr. Justice Kuldeep Mathur, J
DINESH KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
CRLMB / 793 / 2025



Advocates:
Mr. Vijay Raj Bishnoi, Mr. Sameer Pareek, PP

The court granted bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. based on the release of a co-accused and absence of apprehension of the petitioner fleeing justice.

Headnote:(A) NDPS Act - Sections 8, 22, 29, and 37 - Bail application filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. by the petitioner arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.22/2023 for offences under NDPS Act - Co-accused already granted bail; prosecution failed to show apprehension of petitioner fleeing justice - Court inclined to grant bail. (Paras 1, 5, 7, 8)

(B) Bail - Considerations for granting bail - Co-accused released on bail; absence of apprehension of the petitioner involving in similar offences - Judicial custody and prolonged trial considered. (Paras 4, 7)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner was arrested for possession of contraband as per F.I.R. No.22/2023, with 67 Gms. of contraband recovered from the co-accused, who has been granted bail. The petitioner is in judicial custody with the investigation completed.

Findings of Court:
The court found that the petitioner should be granted bail considering the release of the co-accused and lack of evidence showing risk of fleeing.

Issues: The primary issue was whether the petitioner should be granted bail in light of the co-accused being released and the lack of apprehension from the prosecution.

Ratio Decidendi: The court determined that the absence of any threat to justice and the prior granting of bail to the co-accused warranted the release of the petitioner on bail.

Result: Bail application allowed.

ORDER :

KULDEEP MATHUR, J.

1.This application for bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the petitioner who has been arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.22/2023 registered at Police Station Jhab, Dist. Jalore, for the offences under Sections 8/22 and 29 of the NDPS Act .

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that in the present case, 67 Gms. of contraband (MD) was recovered from the conscious possession of co-accused Ramgopal. Learned counsel submitted that as per the prosecution, the recovered contraband was procured by the co-accused Ramgopal from the present petitioner.

3. It was contended that the co-accused Ramgopal (S.B. Criminal Misc. 3rd Bail Application No.8926/2024) has already been dated 20.09.2024. It was submitted that since the co-accused Ramgopal from whose conscious possession, contraband greater than commercial quantity was recovered has already been enlarged on bail, the petitioner who is in judicial custody and investigation against whom has already been completed, also deserve to be enlarged on bail.

4. Lastly, learned counsel submitted that the petitioner is in judicial custody and the trial of the case will take sufficiently long time, therefore, the benefit of bail may be granted to the accused-petitioner.

5. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. Learned Public Prosecutor submitted that in the present case, contraband greater than commercial quantity has been recovered by the investigating agency and therefore, the embargo contained under Section 37 of the NDPS Act is attracted. However, he was not in a position to refute the fact that the co-accused Ramgopal from whose conscious possession, contraband (MD) was recovered, has already been enlarged on bail by the co-ordinate Bench of this Court.

6. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material available on record.

7. Having considered the rival submissions, facts and circumstances of the case particularly keeping in view the fact that the co-accused Ramgopal from whose conscious possession, contraband greater than commercial quantity was recovered, has already been enlarged on bail by the co-ordinate Bench of this Court. The prosecution has not shown any apprehension of the petitioner involving himself in a case of similar nature or fleeing away from justice, in case he is enlarged on bail. Thus, without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail.

8. Consequently, the bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed. It is ordered that the accused-petitioner Dinesh Kumar S/o Shri Babu Lal, arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.22/2023 registered at Police Station Jhab, Dist. Jalore, shall be released on bail, if not wanted in any other case, provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- and two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each, to the satisfaction of learned trial court, for his appearance before that court on each & every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till completion of the trial.

9. It is however, made clear that findings recorded/observations made above are for limited purposes of adjudication of bail application. The trial court shall not get prejudiced by the same.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top