SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Raj) 130

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
MR. JUSTICE FARJAND ALI, J
Abhay Sharma – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
Mr. Aashish for Mr. Nayab Khan, Mr. Vikram Singh Rajpurohit, P.P., Mr. S.K. Dadhich

ORDER :

FARJAND ALI, J.

1. The instant criminal misc. petition has been filed under Section 528 B.N.S.S. (Section 482 Cr.PC) for quashing of the entire proceeding pending in the Court of learned Metropolitan Magistrate No.2, Jodhpur Metro (hereinafter to be referred as ‘the trial court’) in Case No.19768/2024, arising out of FIR No.180/2023 registered at Mahila Police Station, Jodhpur East, District Jodhpur for the offences under Sections 498-A , 406 & 323 of IPC , on the ground of compromise.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the dispute in this matter is inter se between the parties which does not affect the societal interest or anyway disturb the tranquility or public peace. It is further submitted that both the parties have settled their disputes through amicable settlement, for which a compromise-deed has been executed and submitted before the learned trial court.

3. It is also submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the charge-sheet has been filed against the petitioner for the offence under Sections 498-A , 406 & 323 of IPC , however, the learned trial court has attested the compromise for the offences under Sections 406 & 323 of IPC but refused to

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top