SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(RAJ) 515

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
MR. JUSTICE FARJAND ALI, J
NITIN SHARMA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
CRLMP / 549 / 2025



Advocates:
Mr. S.K. Verma, Mr. N.S. Chandawat, P.P., Mr. Mrinal Khatri

Non-compoundable offences may be quashed if they are personal in nature and do not affect public peace, promoting harmony between parties.

Headnote:(A) Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 498A, 406 and 323 - Quashing of FIR - The petitioners sought to quash FIR No.119/2022 for offences under IPC sections mentioned, citing amicable settlement between parties - Court emphasized that non-compoundable offences may be quashed if they are personal in nature and do not affect public peace, as supported by Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab - The court found that the dispute was private, and pursuing prosecution would obstruct restoration of peace - (Paras 5, 6)

(B) Inherent Powers - The High Court may exercise inherent powers to quash proceedings if it promotes harmony and resolves disputes between parties, especially in personal matters that do not impact society at large - (Paras 5, 6)

Facts of the case:
The petitioners and complainant-respondent resolved their dispute amicably and sought to quash the FIR and subsequent proceedings, admitting no further controversy remains.

Findings of Court:
The court acknowledged the compromise and deemed it appropriate to quash the FIR and all related proceedings to maintain harmony between the parties.

Issues: The main issue was whether the FIR could be quashed despite the offences being non-compoundable due to the personal nature of the dispute.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that, based on Supreme Court precedent, non-compoundable offences may still be quashed if they are personal and do not disrupt public peace, allowing for the restoration of relationships.

Result: Petition allowed; FIR and all proceedings quashed.

Order :

1. This instant criminal misc. petition has been filed under 528 BNSS (482 Cr.P.C.) for quashing of FIR No.119/2022 registered at Police Station Mahila Thana (Bikaner), District Bikaner for the offence under Sections 498A , 406 and 323 of the IPC .

2. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the dispute in between the parties has been resolved through an amicable settlement and now, there remains no controversy in between them and the parties do not wish to continue the criminal proceedings further.

3. Learned counsel appearing for complainant-respondent admits the fact of compromise and submits that he is willing if the FIR and the proceedings are quashed on the basis of compromise entered in between the parties.

4. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the petition.

5. Heard, perused the material available on record more particularly the nature of allegation and the compromise deed executed in between the parties. The parties to the lis have resolved their dispute amicably and do not wish to continue the criminal proceedings and have jointly prayed for quashing of the same. The offence alleged in this matter is non-compoundable, however, Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab [ (2012) 10 SCC 303 ] has propounded that if it is convinced that offences are entirely personal in nature and do not affect the public peace or tranquility and where it feels that quashing of such proceedings on account of compromise would bring about peace and would secure ends of justice, the High Court should not hesitate to quash the same by exercising the inherent powers vested in it. It is observed that in such cases, the prosecution becomes a lame prosecution and pursuing such a lame prosecution would be a waste of time and energy that will also unsettle the compromise and obstruct restoration of peace. This court is aptly guided by the principles propounded by Hon’ble the Supreme Court and feels that where the dispute is essentially inter se between the parties, either they are relatives, neighbours or having business relationship and which does not affect the society at large, then in such cases, with a view to maintain harmonious relationships between the two sides, to end-up the dispute in between them permanently as well as for restitution of relationship, the High Court should exercise its inherent power to quash the FIR and all other subsequent proceedings initiated thereto.

6. Here in these cases, though the offences are not compoundable but the parties have settled the dispute amicably and that is essentially in between the parties which is not affecting public peace and tranquility, therefore, with a view to maintain the harmony and to resolve the dispute finally in between the parties, it is deemed appropriate to quash the FIR and all further proceedings undertaken in pursuance thereof.

7. Accordingly, this criminal misc. petition is allowed and the FIR mentioned above, and all further proceedings undertaken in pursuance thereof are hereby quashed and set aside.

8. The stay petition also stands disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top