HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR GARG, J
GURMANGAT – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
Order :
1. The present fourth bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS/439 Cr.P.C. The petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.247/2020 Police Station Sadar Chittorgarh, District Chittorgarh for the offences punishable under Section 8/18 of the NDPS Act .
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that upto this time total six prosecution witnesses have been examined out of total 15 cited witnesses. Counsel submitted that trial is pending for last three and half years and trial of the case will take sufficient time, therefore, the bail may be granted to the petitioner.
3. In support of his contentions, learned counsel placed reliance on the recent order dated 13.07.2023 passed by Hon’ble the Supreme Court in the case of Rabi Prakash vs. The State of Odisha ( Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No.4169/2023 ), wherein Hon’ble the Supreme Court held as under:-
“3. We are informed that the trial has commenced but only 1 out of the 19 witnesses has been examined. The conclusion of trial will, thus, take some more time.
4. As regard to the twin conditions contained in Section 37 of the NDPS Act , learned counsel for the respondent – State has been duly heard. T
Prolonged incarceration exceeding three years justifies bail under NDPS Act despite statutory restrictions, emphasizing the right to a speedy trial.
Prolonged incarceration can justify bail despite statutory restrictions under the NDPS Act, emphasizing the right to a speedy trial.
Prolonged incarceration can justify bail despite statutory restrictions under the NDPS Act, emphasizing the right to a speedy trial.
Bail – Fifth bail application filed solely on the ground of custody period of accused and keeping in view fact that trial against him has not been completed till date, deserves to be accepted.
The significant delay in trial proceedings justifies the granting of bail despite statutory restrictions, prioritizing the right to personal liberty.
The delay in trial and prolonged incarceration can warrant granting bail despite statutory restrictions under the NDPS Act.
The central legal point established in the judgment is that prolonged incarceration militates against the fundamental right guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution, and bail can be granted ba....
Prolonged incarceration and delays in trial can justify bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C., emphasizing the right to a speedy trial under Article 21.
Prolonged pre-trial detention can justify bail despite statutory restrictions, emphasizing the right to personal liberty and speedy trial.
Custody duration and lack of trial progress can lead to bail grant despite statutory restrictions under the NDPS Act.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.