SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(RAJ) 201

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI, MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SHRIMALI, JJ
SANDEEO JAISWAL @ AALU – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent


Advocates:
Mr. Kalu Ram Bhati, Mr. C.S. Ojha, PP

Order :

1. The appellant-applicant herein has been convicted and sentenced as below vide judgment dated 09.12.2019 passed by the learned Additional Session Judge No.2, Jodhpur Metro, in Sessions Case No.14/2015:

OffenceSentenceFine
302 IPCLife Imprisonment Rs.10,000/- and in default of which to further undergo six months’ R.I.
120-B of IPCLife ImprisonmentRs.10,000/- and in default of which to further undergo six months’ R.I.
404 of IPC03 Years R.I.Rs.5,000/- and in default of which to further undergo two months’ R.I.
4/25 of Arms Act03 Years of R.I.Rs.5,000/- and in default of which to further undergo two months’ R.I.

2. The appellant-applicant has preferred the application for suspension of sentence under Section 389 Cr.P.C. for suspension of sentences during the pendency of the appeal and for release on bail.

3. The plea raised by learned counsel for the appellant- applicant is that the applicant has undergone a sentence of 10 years, 02 months and 22 days (as per the report furnished by learned Public Prosecutor) and there is no chance of hearing of the appeal in near future, thus, in view of the directions of the Hon’ble Supreme Court dated 15.09.2022 in Sonadhar v. The State of Chhatt

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top