SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(RAJ) 415

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR, MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN, JJ
HAMEERA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent


Advocates:
Mr. JVS Deora, Mr. Deepak Choudhary, GA cum AAG

Table of Content
1. opposition to application for suspension (Para 6)
2. considered the submissions (Para 7)
3. no possibility of hearing (Para 8)
4. directions issued by supreme court (Para 9 , 11 , 14)
5. observations made regarding grant of bail (Para 10)
6. suspension of sentence granted (Para 12)
7. application for suspension allowed (Para 13)

Order :

OffenceSentenceFine
447 IPC03 months SIRs.500/- in default of payment of fine, further undergo 5 days Addl.S.I.
302/34 IPCLife ImprisonmentRs.50,000/- in default of payment of fine, further undergo 10 months Addl.S.I.-
Both the sentences were ordered to run concurrently

3. The appellant-applicant has preferred this second application under Section 389 Cr.P.C. seeking suspension of sentence during the pendency of the appeal and for release on bail on the ground that petitioner has remained in custody for more than 10 years.

5. Learned counsel argued that no reasons and / or aggravating circumstances exist for denial of bail to the applicant while placing reliance on the order dated 05.10.2021 of Hon’ble The Supreme Court in Saudan Singh v. The State of Uttar Pradesh : SLP (Crl.) No.4633/2021. He read the relevant part/observations made therein

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top