HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP MATHUR, J
RAKESH @ RAKESH (ENGINE) – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
Order :
1. This application for bail under Section 483 of BNSS has been filed by the petitioner who has been arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.132/2024 registered at Police Station Borunda, District Jodhpur Rural for offences under Sections 78(1) of BNS; Section 5(g)/6 of POCSO Act ; and 3(2)(v) of SC/ST Act .
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material available on record.
3. Drawing attention of the Court towards the FIR and the statements of the victim ‘S’ recorded under Section 183 of B NSS , learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that as per the victim ‘S’ on the date of alleged incident her sister-in-law- Saroj called the petitioner to their house, thereafter, on being asked by her he committed sexual assault upon the victim ‘S’. Learned counsel submitted that the statements of the victim recorded under Section 183 B NSS clearly indicate that the FIR has been lodged after a delay of four months from the date of alleged incident. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that no plausible explanation has been furnished by the victim ‘S’ for lodging the FIR after a delay of about four months. Learned counsel fu
Delay in lodging FIR without plausible explanation undermines prosecution's credibility, justifying bail.
Delay in lodging FIR without plausible explanation can undermine the credibility of allegations, impacting bail decisions.
The court granted bail based on the consensual nature of the relationship between the petitioner and the victim, finding no risk of influencing witnesses or fleeing from justice.
Bail granted due to victim's hostile testimony undermining prosecution's case and consideration of judicial custody duration.
Bail granted due to completed investigation, absence of prior criminal record, and no risk of influencing witnesses.
The court granted bail based on the victim's voluntary actions and lack of allegations of coercion, emphasizing the importance of her statements in the bail decision.
Bail can be granted when there is no apprehension of influencing witnesses or tampering with evidence, and where the prosecution's case lacks sufficient material to support the allegations.
The court determined that a minor's voluntary elopement with the accused, coupled with no evidence of coercion, justified granting bail despite serious charges.
The court denied bail based on the gravity of allegations and the potential influence on witnesses, emphasizing the need for a fair trial.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.