HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
MR. JUSTICE FARJAND ALI, J
Prithvi Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
Order :
1. The instant criminal misc. Petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.PC/under Section 528 of B.N.S.S. for quashing of FIR No.477/2024 registered at Police Station Jaitaran, District Pali for the offences under Sections 420, 406 & 120-B IPC.
2. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the dispute in between the parties has been resolved through an amicable settlement and now, there remains no controversy in between them and the parties do not wish to continue the criminal proceedings further.
3. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the petition.
4. On the other hand, learned counsel appearing for complainant- respondent admits the fact of compromise and submits that he is willing if the FIR and the proceedings are quashed on the basis of compromise entered in between the parties.
5. Heard, perused the material available on record more particularly the police report, nature of allegation and the compromise deed executed in between the parties. The parties to the lis have resolved their dispute amicably and do not wish to continue the criminal proceedings and have jointly prayed for quashing of the same by filing a joint application before the trial court.
The High Court can quash FIRs for personal disputes that do not affect public peace, emphasizing the importance of amicable settlements in maintaining harmony.
The High Court can quash non-compoundable FIRs when disputes are personal and do not affect public peace, as guided by precedent.
The High Court can quash a non-compoundable FIR based on an amicable settlement between parties when it does not affect public peace.
The court can quash non-compoundable offences if the dispute is personal and does not affect public peace, promoting harmony between parties.
Quashing of non-compoundable FIRs is permissible when disputes are personal, do not affect public peace, and are resolved amicably.
Personal disputes that do not affect public peace may be quashed by the High Court to restore harmony, following the precedent set in Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab.
The High Court can quash non-compoundable offences if parties resolve disputes amicably and it does not affect public peace, exercising inherent powers for justice.
The court can quash non-compoundable offences if the dispute is personal and does not affect public peace, promoting justice and harmony.
The High Court can quash non-compoundable offences if the dispute is personal and does not affect public peace, aiming to restore harmony between parties.
Non-compoundable offences may be quashed if they are personal in nature and do not affect public peace, promoting harmony between parties.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.