SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(RAJ) 444

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR, J
JOITA RAM – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent


Advocates:
Mr. Shambhoo Singh for Petitioner(s), Mr. Vinay Chhipa, AGC for Respondent(s)

Order :

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner against the order dated 12.07.2024 (Annex.6) passed by the District Collector, Sanchor in Revision Petition No.15/2023 whereby the revision petition filed by the Gram Panchayat, Bargaon, Panchayat Samiti, Raniwara District Sanchor for canceling the Patta dated 25.09.2019 issued in favour of the petitioner has been allowed.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the application submitted by the petitioner was duly considered by the Gram Panchayat, Bargaon and based on that, the Patta was issued in favour of the petitioner on 25.09.2019 by the Gram Panchayat, Bargaon under Rule 157 (1) of the Rajasthan Panchayati Raj Rules, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as ‘Rules of 1996’). Learned counsel submits that the petitioner simply filed an application for issuance of Patta for installation of a Cabin and if the Gram Panchayat, Bargaon has considered same under Rule 157 (1) of the Rules of 1996 then the petitioner should not be punished for the same. Learned counsel further submits that the order passed by the Revisional Court on the face of it, is not based upon correct

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top