SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Raj) 151

VINIT KUMAR MATHUR
Banshilal S/o Sh. Hema Ji – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Nirupam Gupta

ORDER :

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

2. The present writ petition has been filed against the order dated 15.01.2018 passed by the District Collector, Pali, whereby the Patta issued to the petitioner was cancelled.

3. Briefly noted the facts in the matter are that the petitioner filed an application on 10.06.2014 before the Gram Panchayat, Roopawas for grant of Patta of the ancestral residential plot which was occupied by him. During the proceedings, an objection was filed by the respondent No.2-Champalal, who is the brother of the petitioner. However, the Gram Panchayat, Roopawas granted Patta No.78 dated 27.10.2014 in favour of the petitioner. Against the grant of Patta to the petitioner, the respondent No.2 filed a revision petition under Section 97 of the Rajasthan Panchayati Raj Act, 1994 before the District Collector, Pali. The District Collector, Pali, after hearing the parties, allowed the revision petition filed by the respondent No.2 and cancelled the Patta issued in favour of the petitioner. Hence, the present writ petition has been filed.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner vehemently submitted that the petitioner is in possession of the plot/property in qu

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top