HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JAIPUR BENCH)
MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL, J
BHAGIRATH SINGH SON KALYAN SINGH RANAN – Appellant
Versus
M/S ADITYA BUILDERS – Respondent
Judgment :
1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instructions, does not press the writ petition on merits and prays for a reasonable time (upto 31.07.2026) to vacate the premises.
2. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents has no objection to the prayer made; he, however, submits that the petitioner may be granted time subject to payment of a sum of Rs.2,000/- per month by way of mesne profit.
3. This is not objected by the learned counsel for the petitioner.
4. In the aforesaid circumstance, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed. The petitioner is granted time upto 31.07.2026 to hand over vacant and peaceful possession of the rented premises to the respondents subject to following conditions:-
1. The entire arrears of rent/mesne profit till date, shall be deposited by the petitioner in the bank account of respondents within a period of four weeks from the date of the order.
2. The petitioner shall pay a sum of ₹2,000/- per month towards mesne profit to the respondents from 01.03.2025 till vacation of the rented premises i.e. on or before 31.07.2026, which may be deposited by him in the bank account of the respondents by 10th day of each succeeding month.
3. Th
The court upheld the conditions for eviction and payment of mesne profits, emphasizing compliance to avoid immediate eviction.
A tenant's agreement to vacate and pay mesne profits can lead to dismissal of eviction petitions without delving into merits.
The court's decision was based on the petitioner's agreement to handover possession and pay mesne profit with specified conditions, as well as the dismissal of the writ petition.
The court established that tenants may be granted additional time to vacate premises under the Rent Control Act, provided they comply with conditions regarding payment of rent and maintenance of the ....
A party's willingness to comply with court orders regarding possession and rent payment can lead to a structured resolution without contesting merits.
The court upheld previous judgments and mandated the petitioner to vacate the premises and settle arrears, emphasizing compliance with the undertaking.
A party's willingness to comply with court orders regarding possession and payment can lead to judicial directions for compliance and potential contempt for non-compliance.
The court upheld the orders of the Rent Tribunal and Rent Appellate Tribunal, emphasizing compliance with court orders regarding possession and payment of rent.
The court upheld the tenant's right to occupy the premises for a limited period, subject to compliance with specified conditions and obligations.
Court emphasizes compliance with rental agreements and potential contempt for non-compliance.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.