Abdul Rahim vs Mohammad Harun - 2021 Supreme(Raj) 1766

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2021 Supreme(Raj) 1766

VIJAY BISHNOI
Abdul Rahim – Appellant
Versus
Mohammad Harun – Respondent

Advocates appeared:
Mr. Sanjay Nahar, for the Appellant; Mr. Alkesh Kumar Agarwal, Mr. Irfan Gori, for the Respondent.

ORDER

1. The petitioner-non-applicant has preferred these two writ petitions being aggrieved by the impugned judgment and decree dated 06.11.2019 passed by the Appellate Rent Tribunal, Bhilwara in Rent Appeal Nos. 175/2013 and 176/2013, whereby the appeals of the petitioner as well as of the respondent have been dismissed and the judgment dated 18.07.2013 passed by the Rent Tribunal, Bhilwara has been affirmed. By the judgment dated 18.07.2013, the Rent Tribunal, Bhilwara has allowed the original application filed by the respondent for eviction and recovery of rent against the petitioner on the ground of reasonable and bonafide necessity only.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner upon instructions submits that the petitioner do not want to press these writ petitions on merits, however, prays that reasonable time may be granted to him to handover the vacant and peaceful possession of the suit premises.

3. Learned counsel for the respondent agrees that he has no objection if reasonable time is given to the petitioner to handover the vacant and peaceful possession of the suit premises.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is ready to pay the mesne profi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document