HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR, J
VIJAY PAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
CRLMB / 1359 / 2025
Order :
1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita on behalf of accused- petitioner. The accused-petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.02/2023, registered at Police Station Sakada, District Jaisalmer for the offence(s) under Sections 5/25 Arms Act.
2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. It is argued that the allegations of dacoity and committing theft are against the other co-accused Shrawan Singh, Rawal Singh and Anil Kumar, who have already been enlarged on bail by the trial Court. The accused-petitioner was involved in the commission of robbery/dacoity. It is alleged against the accused-petitioner that he supplied firearms to the main accused, there is no substantive evidence available on record to the fact that the accused- petitioner supplied firearms to the main accused. The accused- petitioner is in custody since 08.01.2025 and trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, the bail application of the accused-petitioner may be allowed.
3. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the grant of bail application. It is contended that the accused-petitioner is habitual offender and against him 19 cases under the various act have been registered, therefore, considering the criminal antecedents of the accused-petitioner, the bail application of the accused-petitioner may be dismissed.
4. Heard and perused material available on the record.
5. The main allegations of committing robbery are against the other co-accused, who have already been enlarged on bail by the trial Court and by this Court and apart from the disclosure statements of the other co-accused, there is no substantive evidence available on the record that the accused-petitioner supplied firearms to the main accused, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail.
6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 of BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner-Vijay Pal S/o Sri Jagdish, in connection with FIR No.02/2023, registered at Police Station Sakada, District Jaisalmer, shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so.
Bail may be granted when there is insufficient evidence against the accused, especially if co-accused have been released on bail.
In the absence of substantive evidence, bail may be granted to prevent prolonged custody, even for habitual offenders.
The court emphasized that a lack of substantive evidence against the accused-petitioner, combined with prolonged custody, warranted the granting of bail.
The applicants were entitled to bail due to insufficient evidence linking them to the crime and the completion of the investigation.
Bail granted under specific conditions when no compelling reason for detention exists and investigation is substantially complete.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.