SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(RAJ) 492

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR, J
VIJAY PAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
CRLMB / 1359 / 2025



Advocates:
Mr. Ashok Bhawad, Adv., Mr. Hanuman Prajapat, PP, Mr. Pawan Kumar Bhati, Assistant Govt. Adv.

Bail may be granted when there is insufficient evidence against the accused, especially if co-accused have been released on bail.

Headnote:(A) Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita - Section 483 - Bail application filed by accused-petitioner arrested under FIR No.02/2023 for offences under Sections 5/25 Arms Act - Allegations of dacoity against co-accused, with no substantive evidence against accused-petitioner for supplying firearms - Accused-petitioner in custody since 08.01.2025, trial may take considerable time. (Paras 1-5)

(B) Grant of bail - Consideration of criminal antecedents and lack of substantive evidence against accused-petitioner - Co-accused already granted bail, leading to the conclusion that it is just and proper to enlarge accused-petitioner on bail. (Paras 2, 5)

Facts of the case:
The accused-petitioner was arrested in connection with FIR No.02/2023 for offences under the Arms Act. It was argued that he was falsely implicated, with no evidence of supplying firearms to the main accused. The accused has been in custody since January 2025.

Findings of Court:
The court found that the allegations against the accused-petitioner were not substantiated by evidence, and he should be granted bail.

Issues: The main issues addressed were the lack of evidence against the accused-petitioner and the comparison with co-accused who were granted bail.

Ratio Decidendi: The court determined that without substantive evidence against the accused-petitioner, and considering the co-accused had been granted bail, it was just to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail.

Result: Bail application allowed.

Order :

1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita on behalf of accused- petitioner. The accused-petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.02/2023, registered at Police Station Sakada, District Jaisalmer for the offence(s) under Sections 5/25 Arms Act.

2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. It is argued that the allegations of dacoity and committing theft are against the other co-accused Shrawan Singh, Rawal Singh and Anil Kumar, who have already been enlarged on bail by the trial Court. The accused-petitioner was involved in the commission of robbery/dacoity. It is alleged against the accused-petitioner that he supplied firearms to the main accused, there is no substantive evidence available on record to the fact that the accused- petitioner supplied firearms to the main accused. The accused- petitioner is in custody since 08.01.2025 and trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, the bail application of the accused-petitioner may be allowed.

3. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the grant of bail application. It is contended that the accused-petitioner is habitual offender and against him 19 cases under the various act have been registered, therefore, considering the criminal antecedents of the accused-petitioner, the bail application of the accused-petitioner may be dismissed.

4. Heard and perused material available on the record.

5. The main allegations of committing robbery are against the other co-accused, who have already been enlarged on bail by the trial Court and by this Court and apart from the disclosure statements of the other co-accused, there is no substantive evidence available on the record that the accused-petitioner supplied firearms to the main accused, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail.

6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 of BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner-Vijay Pal S/o Sri Jagdish, in connection with FIR No.02/2023, registered at Police Station Sakada, District Jaisalmer, shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top