SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(RAJ) 514

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
MR. JUSTICE FARJAND ALI, J
MOHAN RAM – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
CRLMP / 7311 / 2024



Advocates:
Mr. Pawan Vishnoi, Mr. Surendra Bishnoi, PP

The court ruled that imposing a bank guarantee for vehicle release was unjustified, emphasizing practical ownership rights and vehicle maintenance considerations.

Headnote:(A) Criminal Procedure Code - Section 528 - Indian Penal Code - Sections 353, 379 - Minor Mineral Concession Rules - Section 4/21 - Release of vehicle - The court quashed the imposition of a bank guarantee condition of Rs.30,00,000/- for the release of a JCB vehicle, deeming it harsh and unnecessary based on judicial precedent. (Paras 1, 5, 6)

(B) Judicial Precedents - The court relied on Sunder Bhai Ambalal Desai Vs. State of Gujarat, emphasizing the necessity of balancing legal requirements with the practical implications of vehicle custody. (Paras 2, 5)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner sought the release of a JCB vehicle seized under FIR No.248/2023, arguing entitlement as the registered owner and the detrimental effects of prolonged custody on the vehicle.

Findings of Court:
The court found the bank guarantee condition imposed by the lower court to be onerous and unwarranted, allowing the release of the vehicle upon other conditions.

Issues: The primary issue was the legality and fairness of the bank guarantee requirement for vehicle release.

Ratio Decidendi: The court established that the imposition of a bank guarantee was unjustified, prioritizing the practical considerations of vehicle maintenance and ownership rights.

Result: Misc. Petition allowed.

Order

1. The instant criminal miscellaneous petition under Section 528 of BNSS has been preferred by the petitioner against the order dated 10.10.2024 passed by the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Khivsar, District Nagaur in FIR No.248/2023, Police Station Khivsar, District Nagaur registered for the offence under Sections 353 , 379 of IPC and 4/21 of MMDR Act, whereby the learned Judge accepted the application filed by the petitioner for releasing JCB bearing Registration No.RJ-21-EA-3003 but imposed condition upon the petitioner to furnish bank guarantee of Rs.30,00,000/-. Hence, the instant Misc. Petition.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a registered owner and is entitled to get back the possession of the vehicle in question. There is no other claimant. If the vehicle is stationed in the Police station premises, the condition of vehicle will deteriorate and the same would be a national loss. He placed reliance on the judgment passed by the Supreme Court in the case of Sunder Bhai Ambalal Desai Vs. State of Gujarat [ (2002) 10 SCC 283 ].

3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposed the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner.

4. I have heard and considered the submissions advanced at the Bar and gone through the order impugned as well as the material made available to the Court.

5. In view of the settled legal propositions and guided by the judicial pronouncement passed in the case of Sunder Bhai Ambalal Desai (supra), and considering that the condition No.6 imposed by the court below regarding furnishing bank guarantee of Rs.30,00,000/-, is harsh and onerous, this Court is of the view that there is no requirement of furnishing bank guarantee thus, it is deemed just and appropriate to allow the instant Misc. Petition.

6. Accordingly, the Misc. Petition is allowed. The order dated 10.10.2024 passed by the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Khivsar, District Nagaur passed in FIR No. 248/2023, Police Station Khivsar, District Nagaur is hereby quashed to the extent of condition regarding furnishing bank guarantee of Rs.30.00,000/-. Thus the condition of furnishing bank guarantee of the aforesaid amount is waived. The vehicle shall be released upon furnishing supurdginama and surety as directed by the Court below. It is further made clear that if any compounding fees is pending with the Mining Department, the same shall be paid by the petitioner within 15 days and only whereafter the vehicle shall be released and condition No.14 of the order dated 10.10.2024 shall be stuck down.

7. All pending applications, if any, stands disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top