SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(RAJ) 633

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
MR. JUSTICE SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR, MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR SHARMA, JJ
AJAY KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
SOSA / 195 / 2024



Advocates:
Mr. Rajender Singh Charan, Adv., Mr. Deepak Choudhary, AAG, Mr. Umesh Kant Vyas, Adv.

The court may suspend a life sentence based on the duration of custody and circumstances of the case, even when evidence against the convict exists.

Headnote:(A) Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 302 and 34 - Suspension of sentence application - Convict-applicant sentenced to life imprisonment; co-accused found juvenile - Prosecution's key witness turned hostile, yet scientific evidence supported prosecution - Considering the convict's custody of seven and a half years, the sentence was suspended pending appeal. (Paras 1, 5, 6)

(B) Bail Conditions - Conditions imposed for bail include annual appearance before the trial court and notification of address changes. (Para 6)

Facts of the case:
The convict-applicant, sentenced to life imprisonment for murder, applied for suspension of sentence after serving seven and a half years, while the co-accused's trial was separated due to juvenile status. The key witness did not support the prosecution, but scientific evidence linked the convict to the crime.

Findings of Court:
The court found sufficient grounds to suspend the sentence based on the convict's period of custody and the nature of evidence presented.

Issues: The court addressed the appropriateness of suspending the sentence in light of the convict's lengthy incarceration and the evidence presented.

Ratio Decidendi: The court determined that the convict's lengthy custody warranted suspension of the sentence, despite the prosecution's evidence, pending the outcome of the appeal.

Result: Application allowed; convict released on bail under specified conditions.

ORDER :

This Suspension of Sentence Application has been moved by the convict-applicant who has suffered the sentence of life imprisonment under section 302 read with section 34 of the Indian Penal Code; co-accused Aman was found juvenile and his trial was separated.

2. On the basis of written report of Harendra Singh, a crime report no. 158 of 2017 was registered and the present convict-applicant and co-accused Aman were sent up for trial.

3. In the trial, the prosecution examined thirteen witnesses out of whom PW-3 Bhagwanti was projected as an eye-witness. However, while tendering evidence in the Court, PW-3 did not support the prosecution and she was declared hostile at the instance of the prosecution.

4. This Suspension of Sentence Application has been opposed by Mr. Deepak Choudhary, the learned Additional Advocate General and Mr. Umesh Kant Vyas, the learned counsel appearing for the informant.

5. Mr. Umesh Kant Vyas, the learned counsel for the informant has taken us through the scientific evidence brought on record which would indicate that the blood-stained shirt carried the same blood as of the deceased-Ajindrapal Singh.

6. However, having regard to the period of custody undergone by the present convict-applicant who has remained in jail for about seven and a half years and the aforementioned facts and circumstances in the case, we are inclined to suspend the sentece awarded to the convict-applicant Ajay Kumar son of Raj Kumar in Sessions Case No.15 of 2017 till final disposal of D.B. Criminal Appeal No.51 of 2024. D.B. Criminal Misc Suspension of Sentence Application (Appeal) No. 195 of 2024 is allowed. The convict-applicant shall be released on bail, upon furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge on the conditions indicated below:-

“1. That he will appear before the trial Court in the month of January every year till the appeal is decided.

2. That if the applicant changes the place of residence, he will give in writing his changed address to the trial Court as well as to the counsel in the High Court.

3. Similarly, if the sureties change their address(s), they will give in writing their changed address to the trial Court.”

7. The convict-applicant shall appear before the Deputy Registrar (Judicial), Rajasthan High Court, Jodhpur on 20th March 2025. The learned trial Court shall keep the record of attendance of the accused-applicant in a separate file. Such file be registered as Criminal Misc. Case related to original case in which the accused-applicant was tried and convicted. A copy of this order shall also be placed in that file for ready reference. Criminal Misc. file shall not be taken into account for statistical purposes relating to pendency and disposal of cases in the trial Court. In case the accused applicant fail to appear before the trial Court, the learned trial Judge shall report the matter to the High Court for cancellation of bail.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top