SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Raj) 82

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JAIPUR BENCH)
MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH, MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR, JJ
Rajendra S/O Chatra - Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan - Respondent
SOSA / 165 / 2025
Decided On : 07-03-2025

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
Mr. Bharat Yadav, Advocate; Mr. Lakhan Singh Meena, Advocate; Mr. Amir Aziz, Advocate; Mr. Mohar Lal Meena, Advocate; Mr. Sudesh Kumar Saini, Additional Advocate General; Mr. Gaurav Gupta, Advocate; Mr. Manoj Seth, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Nitin Kumar Sharma, Advocate

Suspension of sentence justified due to delays in appeal process and circumstances surrounding eyewitness testimonies.

Headnote:

(A) Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Section 302 read with Section 149 - Suspension of sentence applications filed by accused-applicants convicted and sentenced to life imprisonment - Eyewitness statement indicates deceased was already dead upon arrival of witness - Hostile witness declaration by Trial Court noted - Accused-applicants were on bail during trial, and appeal not likely to be heard soon. (Paras 2, 3, 6)

(B) Suspension of sentence - Court considered facts, circumstances, and statements of eyewitnesses - Justified suspension of sentence during appeal process allowing bail under conditions. (Paras 6, 7)

Facts of the case:
Accused-applicants were convicted for murder under IPC, and their appeal is pending with significant delays expected.

Findings of Court:
Suspension of sentence granted during the pendency of appeal, with conditions for appearance before the Court.

Issues: The main issues addressed were the credibility of eyewitness statements and the justification for suspending the sentence during appeal.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that given the circumstances and the delay in appeal, it was just to suspend the sentence, allowing the accused-applicants to be released on bail.

Result: Applications for suspension of sentence allowed.

ORDER :

1. These suspension of sentence applications have been filed by the accused-applicants along with the appeal(s).

2. Counsels appearing on behalf of the accused-applicants submit that the accused-applicants have been convicted and sentenced to undergo life imprisonment for the offence under Section 302 of IPC read with Section 149 thereof.

3. Counsels for the accused-applicants have annexed the certificate(s) under Rule 311 (3) of the Rajasthan High Court Rules to the effect that accused-applicants are in judicial custody. Counsels further submit that eyewitness-PW5, who is wife of the deceased, has admitted in her cross-examination that when she reached at the spot on motorcycle along with her son, the deceased had already died and the body of the deceased was lying there. Counsels further submit that another eyewitness namely Budhi Prakash has been declared hostile by the Trial Court. Counsels further submit that all the applicants were on bail during trial and the appeal(s) is not likely to be heard in near future. Therefore, they prayed that sentence awarded to the accused- applicants may be suspended and the accused-applicants be released on bail during the pendency of the appeal(s).

4. Learned Additional Government Advocate assisted by counsel for the complainant opposed the present application for suspension of sentence.

5. We have heard counsel for the parties and perused the record.

6. Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the present case, and also the statement of eyewitnesses i.e. PW-5 and PW- Bhudhi Prakash and also considering the fact that hearing/disposal of appeal(s) is likely to take long time, we deem it just and proper to allow this criminal miscellaneous suspension of sentence application.

7. In that view of the matter, this criminal miscellaneous suspension of sentence application is allowed and it is ordered that execution of sentence awarded to the accused-applicant shall remain suspended during the pendency of the criminal appeal and the accused-applicant be admitted to bail subject to satisfaction of the trial Court with the stipulation that the accused-applicant shall appear before this Court on 15.04.2024 and thereafter as and when called upon to do so.

8. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court through e-mail/fax for necessary compliance.

9. Copy of this order be separately placed in each connected file.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top