SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Raj) 665

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR GARG, J
Akbar – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates:
Mr. Piyush Chouhan, Mr. Lalit Kishore Sen, PP, Mr. Firoz Khan

ORDER :

MANOJ KUMAR GARG, J.

Instant revision petition under Section 397/401 Cr.P.C . has been filed by the petitioner-complainant against the order dated 10.12.2021 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Jaitaran, District Pali, whereby the learned Judge rejected the application under Section 319 Cr.P.C . filed by the petitioner- complainant for taking cognizance against respondent Nos.4 to 7 and arraigned them as accused, along with the accused respondents No.2 & 3.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the impugned order passed by the learned trial court is per se illegal, erroneous and against the material available on record. Counsel submits that in the FIR, the names of the accused-respondents No.4 to 7 were mentioned, but the Police after investigation filed challan only against accused respondents No.2 & 3. The petitioner-complainant filed applications under Sections 190 & 193 Cr.P.C . before the trial court for summoning the other accused persons, who were not charge-sheeted by the Police. The said applications were rejected by the trial court. Against the said order, the petitioner filed a misc. petition being SB Cr. Misc. Petition No.3546/2016 before

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top