SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Raj) 673

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, MUNNURI LAXMAN
Ajmer Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited – Appellant
Versus
Dala Devi – Respondent


ORDER :

1. Heard.

2. Though the case comes up at the stage of admission, with the consent of both the parties the case is heard finally.

3. Challenge to the impugned order is on the sole ground that the learned Single Judge has allowed the writ petition fastening liability on the appellants to pay Rs. 70 Lakhs without issuing any notice and affording opportunity of hearing to them.

4. The respondent caveator would submit that true it is that the notices were not issued, but the case of the writ petitioner was squarely covered by the order dated 16.07.2024 (Deepika W/o Late Pravin Kumar, SBCWP No.10937/2024) passed by this Court.

5. Whether or not the case of the writ petitioner is squarely covered by the above decision, in our opinion, could not have been finally decided without issuing notice and affording opportunity of hearing to the appellants.

6. The submission of the learned Senior Counsel for the appellants is that there are certain factual aspects also, which are required to be verified and therefore, atleast one opportunity ought to have been afforded to the appellants before passing the impugned order.

7. Having heard the learned counsel for both the parties and after perusing t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top