Back
HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
MR. JUSTICE FARJAND ALI, J
HAJI ABDUL MAJID AND ORS. – Appellant
Versus
STATE AND ORS. – Respondent
Order :
1. By way of filing the instant Miscellaneous Petition, a challenge has been made to the order dated 14.10.2015 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, Merta City in Criminal Complaint No.341/2014 whereby he took cognizance of the offence under Sections 500 and 120B of the IPC upon a criminal complaint submitted by the respondent-complainant after conducting an inquiry as contemplated under Sections 200 and 202 CrPC.
2. I have heard the counsel for the parties and gone through the order under assail and the other material.
3. To successfully establish an offense under Section 500 of the IPC, the complainant is supposed to demonstrate through some material that any defamatory statement was made by the accused and it was made with an intention to harm the complainant. If the statement is made with the knowledge of its potential harm, then also, an action may be taken. It has to be shown that the statement so made by the accused was false, which resulted damage to the reputation of the complainant. The very purpose of enacting the above provision has been to ensure that a person who damage reputation of the other through false and malicious statement can be made accountable.
3.
To establish defamation under IPC Section 500, the complainant must prove a false statement made with intent to harm reputation, which was not demonstrated in this case.
A complaint to lawful authorities alleging misconduct does not constitute defamation under Section 500 IPC if it does not involve publication of defamatory material.
Legal representatives cannot be prosecuted for defamation based on alleged defamatory statements made by the deceased party in the plaint.
Statements in judicial complaints can constitute defamation; however, delays and the need for evidence in support must be taken into account, reinforcing the importance of reputation and good faith i....
The court established that for a defamation claim under IPC Sections 499 and 500, the publication must lower the reputation of the complainant, and the truth of the statements must be proven in their....
A defamation complaint must specify the exact allegedly defamatory words to uphold a conviction under Section 500 IPC, protecting the accused's right to a fair defense.
Accusations made intending harm to reputation do not qualify for the good faith exception under defamation law; burden of proof lies on the accuser.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
