SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(RAJ) 755

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP MATHUR, J
OMPRAKASH @ KALU – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent


Advocates:
Mr. Jagatveer Singh Deora, Mr. Sameer Pareek, PP

ORDER :

(KULDEEP MATHUR, J.)

This second application for bail under Section 483 BNSS has been filed by the petitioner who has been arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.207/2023 registered at Police Station Badnor, Dist. Beawar, for the offences under Sections 363, 366, 344, 376(2)(n)of IPC and Sections 5(l)/6 of POCSO Act.

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material available on record.

3. Prosecution’s case in brief is that the petitioner forcibly abducted and committed rape repeatedly on the victim- ‘P’ who is aged about 17 years.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner who is aged about 22 years is in judicial custody. Learned counsel submitted that the victim- ‘P’ on 20.09.2023 voluntarily went away with the present petitioner. The father of the victim- ‘P’ thereafter lodged the present FIR. Pursuant to the present FIR, when the victim- ‘P’ was discovered by the Investigating Agency she has roped the petitioner in a false criminal case by stating that on the date of the alleged incident, she was forcibly abducted by the petitioner on a motorbike and thereafter, he had repeatedly committed rape upon her.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top