SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(RAJ) 627

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
Mr. Justice Kuldeep Mathur, J
ALKESH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
CRLMB / 1646 / 2025



Advocates:
Mr. Vijay Kumar Gaur, Mr. Urja Ram Kalbi, PP

The court found prima facie merit in the claim of a mutual relationship between the petitioner and the victim, allowing bail due to completed investigation and time served in custody.

Headnote:(A) BNS Act - Sections 333 and 64(1) - POCSO Act - Sections 3/4 - Bail application filed by petitioner arrested under FIR No.249/2024 for offenses related to physical relationship with minor - Petitioner claims mutual relationship with victim; victim's family alleges false case after discovery of compromising situation - Court notes completed investigation and that petitioner has been in custody since 30.09.2024. (Paras 1, 6, 7)

(B) Bail - Considerations for grant - Court finds prima facie merit in petitioner's claim of mutual relationship; emphasizes that observations made are solely for bail adjudication and should not influence trial proceedings. (Paras 6, 8)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner, aged 18, is accused of engaging in a mutual relationship with the 17-year-old victim, leading to allegations after being discovered by her family.

Findings of Court:
The court is inclined to grant bail considering the mutual relationship and the fact that the investigation is complete.

Issues: The main issues addressed were the nature of the relationship between the petitioner and the victim and the appropriateness of granting bail given the circumstances.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the argument regarding a mutual relationship cannot be dismissed at this stage and that the petitioner deserves bail due to the completed investigation and time spent in custody.

Result: Bail application allowed.

ORDER :

(KULDEEP MATHUR, J.)

This application for bail under Section 483 BNSS has been filed by the petitioner who has been arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.249/2024 registered at Police Station Kushalgarh, Dist. Banswara, for the offences under Sections 333 and 64(1) of BNS and Sections 3/4 of POCSO Act.

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material available on record.

3. Drawing attention of the Court towards the FIR and the statements of the victim ‘P’ recorded under various Sections of Cr.P.C., learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner who is aged about 18 years was having a mutual relationship with the victim ‘P’ who is aged about 17 years. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that on the date of the alleged incident, when the victim ‘P’ was alone in the house, she called the petitioner and developed the physical relationship with him. However, when her family members have seen her in a compromising position with the present petitioner, she has roped the petitioner in a false criminal case.

4. Lastly, learned counsel submitted that the petitioner is in judicial custody; challan has already been filed and the trial of the case will take sufficiently long time, therefore, the benefit of bail may be granted to the accused-petitioner.

5. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.

6. Having considered the rival submissions, facts and circumstances of the case and having gone through the challan papers and the statements of the victim ‘P’, this Court prima facie finds that the argument of the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner and the victim ‘P’ were having a mutual relationship, cannot be brushed aside by this Court at this stage; the petitioner who is aged about 18 years is in judicial custody since 30.09.2024 and the investigation against the present petitioner has already been completed. Thus, without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail.

7. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed. It is ordered that the accused-petitioner Alkesh S/o Veerji arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.249/2024 registered at Police Station Kushalgarh, Dist. Banswara, shall be released on bail, if not wanted in any other case, provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- and two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each, to the satisfaction of learned trial court, for his appearance before that court on each & every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till completion of the trial.

8. It is however, made clear that findings recorded/observations made above are for limited purposes of adjudication of bail application. The trial court shall not get prejudiced by the same.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top