HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
Dinesh Mehta, J
RAMLAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
CRLMB / 14672 / 2024
Order :
1. The present application for bail has been filed by the applicant under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C . in connection with FIR No.155/2023, registered at Police Station Rol, District Nagaur for the offences under section 8/29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘NDPS Act’).
2. Mr. Vishnoi, learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant has been implicated on the testimony of co-accused persons namely Hadman Ram and Sharwan Ram who were found possessing the contraband substance, which was below the commercial quantity.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant argued that since the quantity is below commercial, provisions of section 37 of the NDPS Act are not applicable and therefore, the applicant who is behind the bars since 07.08.2024, be enlarged on bail.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor opposed the bail application by contending that three cases of like nature are pending against the applicant and two of them pertains to the year 2024. He therefore prayed that no indulgence be granted to the applicant as there is every likelihood that the applicant, would again indulge in similar type of offence.
5. Learned Public Prosecutor also submitted that call detail report of the co-accused Hadman Ram and Sharwan Ram shows that they were in constant touch with the applicant who is reported to be supplier of the contraband substance.
6. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
7. Indisputably, the quantity of contraband substance in question is 12 grams MDMA (which is below the commercial quantity). Considering the fact that inhibition under section 37 of the NDPS Act is not applicable and applicant cannot be kept incarcerated for indefinite period, in spite of the fact that three cases of like nature is pending against him, this Court is inclined to enlarge him on bail, more particularly because Principal accused namely Hadman Ram and Sharwan Ram have been enlarged on bail.
8. Consequently, the present bail application filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C . is allowed. It is ordered that applicant – Ramlal S/o Mehram arrested in connection with FIR No.155/2023, registered at Police Station Rol, District Nagaur shall be released on bail; provided he executes personal bond in the sum of Rs.2,00,000/- and two sureties of Rs.1,00,000/- each (out of which, one shall be applicant’s wife) to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court.
9. Applicant shall be required to appear before the Trial Court on all dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so.
10. Needless to observe that the above observations made by this Court are on the basis of material so far produced before the Court. They are only prima-facie observation and the same shall however, not come in the way of the trial Court to take independent view of the matter, based on ocular and oral evidence, while finally deciding the case.
The court ruled that the inapplicability of Section 37 of the NDPS Act due to the contraband being below commercial quantity justified granting bail under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C.
The court established that the stringent conditions for granting bail under Section 37 of the NDPS Act must be strictly adhered to, requiring substantial evidence to support claims of innocence.
For bail under NDPS Act, the accused must prove reasonable grounds for believing they are not guilty and unlikely to re-offend.
In drug-related cases, especially involving commercial quantities, bail is denied if there is no reasonable ground to believe the accused is not guilty.
Bail under NDPS Act requires meeting specific conditions; mere custody duration is insufficient for bail.
The court determines that the detention of a petitioner for an NDPS offence is unnecessary due to the nature and quantity of the contraband, allowing bail with conditions.
In bail applications involving commercial quantities of contraband under the NDPS Act, the court must satisfy the stringent requirements of Section 37 to grant relief, necessitating evidence that the....
The court can grant bail if the rigour of Section 37 does not apply due to the nature and quantity of contraband, alongside other considerations.
Bail cannot be granted under the NDPS Act without reasonable grounds for believing in the accused's innocence.
Insufficient evidence for conspiracy or knowledge of possession in narcotics case warrants bail.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.