SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(RAJ) 844

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR GARG, J
AYAN KHAN PATHAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent


Advocates:
Mr. Mangilal Vishnoi, Ms. Sonu Manawat, PP

Order :

1. The petitioner has filed this criminal revision petition under Section 438 & 442 B.N.S.S. to assail the impugned judgment dated 11.12.2024 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Gulabpura, District Bhilwara, whereby the learned trial Court rejected the application under Section 499/505 of B.N.S.S. , moved by the petitioner for releasing the vehicle Alto Car bearing registration No. MP-14-CC-1238.

2. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner, in support of his arguments, has placed reliance on a decision of the co-ordinate Bench of this Court rendered at Jaipur Bench in Prakash Chand Vs. State of Rajasthan reported in 2010(1) Cr.L.R.(Raj.) 507. In the aforesaid judgment, the vehicle and other articles were seized from the accused for carrying contraband of small quantity just above the commercial quantity. It is in that background, the Court has acceded to the prayer of the incumbent and recorded its finding that solely for the reason that the vehicle and other articles are likely to be confiscated after trial, conditional release of the vehicle and other articles on Supurdginama and surety

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top