SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(RAJ) 844

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR GARG, J
AYAN KHAN PATHAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
CRLR / 138 / 2025



Advocates:
Mr. Mangilal Vishnoi, Ms. Sonu Manawat, PP

Conditional release of seized vehicles is permissible under law, provided specific conditions are met, especially when there is a likelihood of confiscation after trial.

Headnote:(A) B.N.S.S. - Sections 438 and 442 - Criminal revision petition for the release of a vehicle seized under narcotics-related charges - The court allowed the petition, quashing the trial court's order rejecting the release application, citing precedents that support conditional release of seized vehicles. (Paras 1-5)

(B) Conditional Release - The court emphasized that conditional release of a vehicle cannot be denied if it is likely to be confiscated after trial, provided certain conditions are met. (Paras 4-5)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner sought the release of an Alto Car seized in connection with a narcotics case, which was denied by the trial court. The petitioner argued for the vehicle's release based on previous case law that allowed for conditional release of seized items.

Findings of Court:
The court found merit in the petitioner's arguments and ruled that the vehicle should be released on 'supardgi' with specified conditions to ensure its availability for trial.

Issues: The primary issue was whether the trial court's refusal to grant conditional release of the vehicle was justified based on existing legal precedents.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the conditional release of seized vehicles is permissible under the law, especially when there is a likelihood of confiscation post-trial, as long as the petitioner adheres to certain conditions.

Result: The revision petition is allowed.

Order :

1. The petitioner has filed this criminal revision petition under Section 438 & 442 B.N.S.S. to assail the impugned judgment dated 11.12.2024 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Gulabpura, District Bhilwara, whereby the learned trial Court rejected the application under Section 499/505 of B.N.S.S. , moved by the petitioner for releasing the vehicle Alto Car bearing registration No. MP-14-CC-1238.

2. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner, in support of his arguments, has placed reliance on a decision of the co-ordinate Bench of this Court rendered at Jaipur Bench in Prakash Chand Vs. State of Rajasthan reported in 2010(1) Cr.L.R.(Raj.) 507. In the aforesaid judgment, the vehicle and other articles were seized from the accused for carrying contraband of small quantity just above the commercial quantity. It is in that background, the Court has acceded to the prayer of the incumbent and recorded its finding that solely for the reason that the vehicle and other articles are likely to be confiscated after trial, conditional release of the vehicle and other articles on Supurdginama and surety cannot be denied and interim custody of the vehicle and other articles can be granted to the incumbent on certain conditions.

4. Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Sunderbhai Ambalal Desai Vs. State of Gujarat reported in 2002 (10) SCC 283 and co- ordinate Bench of this Court at Jaipur Bench in case of Prakash Chand (supra) has held that conditional release of the vehicle cannot be denied.

5. Accordingly, the instant revision petition is allowed and the order dated 11.12.2024 is hereby quashed and set aside and the vehicle Alto Car bearing registration No. MP-14-CC-1238 in question, is ordered to be released on ‘supardgi’ till the completion of the trial upon following conditions:-

(a) the petitioner furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.4,00,000/- each with two sureties of Rs.2,00,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court undertaking to produce the vehicle Alto Car bearing registration No. MP-14-CC-1238 in the Court as and when required to do so.

(b) the petitioner shall get the vehicle Alto Car bearing registration No. MP-14-CC-1238 photographed showing the registration number as well as the chassis number. Such photograph shall be taken in the presence of the Investigating Officer, to be kept on the file of the case.

(c) the personal bonds of the petitioner and bonds of sureties shall carry the photographs of the petitioner and his sureties and the bond of sureties shall further carry the photograph of perhaps identifying them before the Court which is with full residential particulars of the sureties and the persons identifying them.

(d) the petitioner shall undertake not to transfer the ownership of the vehicle Alto Car bearing registration No. MP-14-CC-1238 and not to lease it to anyone and not to make or allow any changes in it to be made so as to make unidentifiable.

(e) the petitioner will not allow the vehicle Alto Car bearing registration No. MP-14-CC-1238 to be used for any antisocial activities including for the purpose of carrying narcotics which may constitute offence under the NDPS Act.”

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top