RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Manoj Kumar Garg, J.
Narayan - Appellant
Versus
State - Respondent
Criminal Revision Petition No. 861 of 2021
Decided On : 25-10-2021
Criminal - Vehicle Release - Cr.P.C. Sections 397, 401, 451 - The court interpreted provisions allowing conditional release of seized vehicles, emphasizing that such release cannot be denied solely due to potential confiscation post-trial.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner filed a criminal revision petition challenging the trial court's rejection of an application for the release of a seized vehicle under Section 451 Cr.P.C.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the trial court's order was incorrect and that the vehicle could be conditionally released based on established legal precedents.
Issues: Whether the trial court erred in denying the application for the release of the seized vehicle under Section 451 Cr.P.C.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that conditional release of a vehicle seized in connection with a criminal case cannot be denied solely because it may be subject to confiscation after trial.
Result: The revision petition is allowed, and the order rejecting the release of the vehicle is quashed.
JUDGMENT
1. Petitioner has filed this criminal revision petition under Section 397 read with Section 401 Cr.P.C. to assail the impugned judgment dated 22.04.2021 passed by Learned Special Judge, NDPS Cases No.l, Chittorgarh (for short, 'learned trial Court') whereby the learned trial Court rejected the application under Section 451 Cr.P.C, moved by the petitioner for releasing the Swift Car bearing No. RJ-06-CD-7006, Chesis NO.MBHCZC035KE411166, Engine NO.D1313509252.
2. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor for the respondent-State.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner, in support of his arguments, has placed reliance on a decision of the co-ordinate Bench of this Court rendered at Jaipur Bench in Prakash Chand Vs. State of Rajasthan reported in 2010(1) Cr.L.R.(Raj.) 507. In the aforesaid judgment, the vehicle and other articles were seized from the accused for carrying contraband of small quantity just above the commercial quantity. It is in this background, that the Court has acceded to the prayer of the incumbent and recorded its finding that solely for the reason that the vehicle and other articles are likely to be confiscated after trial, conditional release of the vehicle and other articles on Supurdginama and surety cannot be denied and interim custody of the vehicle and other articles can be granted to the incumbent on certain conditions. Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Sunderbhai Ambalal Desai Vs. State of Gujarat reported in 2002 (10) SCC 283 and co-ordinate Bench of this Court at Jaipur Bench in case of Prakash Chand (supra) has held that conditional release of the vehicle cannot be denied.
4. Accordingly, the instant revision petition is allowed and the order dated 22.04.2021 is hereby quashed and set aside and the Swift Car bearing No. RJ-06-CD-7006, Chesis NO.MBHCZC035KE411166, Engine NO.D1313509252 in question is ordered to be released on 'supardgi' till the completion of the trial upon following conditions:-
(b) the petitioner shall get the Swift Car bearing No. RJ-06-CD-7006, Chesis No.MBHCZC035KE411166, Engine NO.D1313509252 showing the registration number as well as the chassis number.
Such photograph shall be taken in the presence of the Investigating Officer, to be kept on the file of the case.
(c) the personal bonds of the petitioner and bonds of sureties shall carry the photographs of the petitioner and his sureties and the bond of sureties shall further carry the photograph of perhaps identifying them before the Court which is with full residential particulars of the sureties and the persons identifying them.
(d) the petitioner shall undertake not to transfer the ownership of the Swift Car bearing No. RJ-06-CD-7006, Chesis NO.MBHCZC035KE411166, Engine NO.D1313509252 and not to lease it to anyone and not to make or allow any changes in it to be made so as to make unidentifiable.(e) the petitioner will not allow the vehicle Swift Car bearing No. RJ-06-CD-7006, Chesis NO.MBHCZC035KE411166, Engine NO.D1313509252 to be used for any anti social activities including for the purpose of carrying narcotics which may constitute offence under the NDPS Act."
Conditional release of seized vehicles is permissible under certain conditions, even if confiscation is likely post-trial.
Conditional release of a seized vehicle is permissible if the registered owner meets specified conditions, as established in prior case law.
Conditional release of seized vehicles is permissible under law, provided specific conditions are met, especially when there is a likelihood of confiscation after trial.
Interim release of a vehicle seized under the N.D.P.S. Act is permissible unless the owner fails to prove lack of knowledge regarding its use in the crime.
An innocent owner is entitled to interim custody of a seized vehicle pending trial under the NDPS Act, as supported by Section 60(3) of the Act.
A vehicle seized under the NDPS Act can be released to its registered owner if no confiscation order has been issued, provided ownership is substantiated.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.