Back
HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
MR. JUSTICE ARUN MONGA, J
Amarjot – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
Order :
1. The petitioner herein seeks issuance of an appropriate writ, order and/or direction commanding the respondents to consider the candidature of the petitioner on the post of Medical Officers, (Assistant Commandant) which was withheld due to pending criminal proceedings arising out of matrimonial dispute between him and his estranged wife, instituted at her instance, which were subsequently dropped due to compromise between two of them.
2. Brief facts for the purpose of adjudication are that the respondents have issued an advertisement for the posts of Super Specialist Medical Officer (Second-in-command), Specialist Medical Officer (Deputy Commandant), Medical Officer (Assistant Commandant), and Dental Surgeon (Assistant Commandant) in the Central Armed Police Forces (BSF, CRPF, ITBP, SSB, Assam Rifles), Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India.
2.1. The minimum qualification for the Medical Officer post requires a recognized medical qualification in Allopathic Medicine as per the Indian Medical Councils Act, 1956, along with permanent registration from any State Medical Council.
2.2. The petitioner, being eligible, applied online under the Economic Weaker Sections categor
Pending criminal cases arising from matrimonial disputes should not bar employment if resolved amicably, affirming rights under Articles 14 and 21.
Pending criminal charges do not bar appointment unless proven guilty, affirming rights under Articles 14 and 21.
Allegations from a matrimonial dispute do not automatically disqualify candidates for police appointments; suitability must be assessed contextually based on the nature of offences, not on blanket di....
Pending criminal charges cannot bar government employment unless proven guilty. This holds especially true where prior judgments emphasize fair trial rights in such appointments.
The mere pendency of a criminal case not involving moral turpitude cannot justify denial of appointment, emphasizing the need for contextual evaluation of character and offences.
The court established that mere involvement in a criminal case does not automatically disqualify a candidate for government service; a detailed examination of moral implications is necessary.
Pending criminal cases, particularly of a trivial nature linked to family disputes, do not automatically disqualify candidates for public employment if disclosed truthfully during the recruitment pro....
The gravity of the offence, the stage of trial, and other relevant aspects must be considered while deciding on the cancellation of selection based on a criminal case. Trivial allegations may not be ....
Candidates must truthfully disclose criminal history; denial of employment based solely on pending cases is unjustified if no suppression of information occurs.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
