SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Raj) 957

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
REKHA BORANA
Suresh Chandra – Appellant
Versus
Aji Bai – Respondent


Table of Content
1. counsel for the respondent (Para 8 , 9 , 10)
2. limitation interpretation (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 15 , 16)
3. appeal allowed (Para 14)

Order :

2. The facts are that a suit for specific performance of contract was filed by the plaintiff with a submission that agreement to sell dated 29.04.2016 was executed by defendant respondent No.1 in his favour. As per the terms of the agreement, the defendant Aji Bai was under an obligation first, to get the sale deed of the land in question executed in her favour by one Dakhi Bai who was the actual owner of the land in question at that point of time. Within a period of one month of the said sale deed being got executed by the defendant Aji Bai in her favour by Dakhi Bai, the sale deed was to be executed by Aji Bai in favour of plaintiff Suresh Chandra.

4. It had further been averred that within a period of one month from 19.12.2023, on 05.01.2024, defendant No.1 Aji Bai was requested to get the sale deed executed in favour of the plaintiff but she declined. Thereafter notice dated 13.08.2024 was served on defendant No.1 and when no action was taken upon the same, the present suit was filed on 04.10.2024.

6. Learned counsel for the ap

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top