SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(RAJ) 980

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JAIPUR BENCH)
Mr. Manindra Mohan Shrivastava, CJ, Mr. Justice Uma Shanker Vyas, J
INDRA PRAKASH GOYAL S/O LATE SHRI DWARKA PRASAD GOYAL – Appellant
Versus
KRISHNA KUNAL – Respondent
CCP / 129 / 2025



Advocates:
Mr. R.S. Bhardwaj Advocate, Mr. B.S. Chhaba, Additional Advocate General with Mr. Hardik Singh Advocate

The court emphasized compliance with prior orders and established obligations for authorities to ensure timely execution of directives issued by the court.

Headnote:(A) Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Allegation of willful disobedience of a court order - The court directed examination of the petitioner's case in accordance with a prior order, emphasizing compliance with directives issued by the Supreme Court. (Paras 1-5)

(B) Directions issued - The court outlined obligations for the Commissioner of College Education and relevant authorities to ensure timely compliance with court orders, including a clear order regarding compliance for each contempt petitioner. (Paras 3-4)

Facts of the case:
The contempt petition was filed alleging disobedience of an order dated 06.11.2015. The court opted to dispose of the petition with directions for compliance based on earlier judgments.

Findings of Court:
The contempt petition is disposed of with directions for compliance and the liberty to revive if grievances remain unaddressed.

Issues: The main issue was whether the respondents had willfully disobeyed the court's order.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the obligation of the authorities to comply with court orders and established a framework for reporting compliance.

Result: Contempt petition stands disposed of.

Order :

1. The contempt petition has been filed alleging willful disobedience of an order passed by this Court on 06.11.2015.

2. The order passed by this Court was a judgment in rem.

3. The respondents shall consider the case of the petitioner. Instead of issuing notice on contempt, we are inclined to dispose of this petition with a direction that the case of the petitioner shall also be examined in terms of order dated 01.12.2021 passed by this Court in the case of Shri Banwari Lal Bhukar & Anr. vs. Anoop Khinchi & Ors.-D.B. Civil Contempt Petition No.740/2016 and other connected matters wherein this Court had given detailed directions as below:-

“1. It shall be an obligation on the part of the Commissioner, College Education to immediately release the dues payable to the petitioners as per the directions issued by this Court from time to time and the directions which have already been issued by the Hon’ble Supreme Court on 09.09.2021 in the case of State of Rajasthan Versus Manju Saxena & Ors., Special Leave to Appeal (c) No.13791/2019, wherein, the Hon’ble Supreme Court had directed compliance to be made within a period of eight weeks.

2. A brief, but clear order regarding compliance of the order in respect of each of the contempt petitioners will have to be passed by the concerned Directorate within a period of ten weeks from today.

3. The orders in respect of each of the contempt petitioners, which are required to be passed clearly stating compliance of the order, shall be reported directly to the Registry of this Court, which shall be placed before this Court under a separate registered case.

4. With the aforesaid observations and directions, this contempt petition, at this stage, is disposed off, however, with liberty to revive, if any grievance still remains unredressed.”

4. All the authorities including the Secretariat of the Department of School Education and Secondary Education as also the private school educational institution officials shall be under an obligation to provide necessary information, if any demanded by Directorate of Secondary Education and School Education, towards compliance of the order which was passed earlier by this Court and in the case referred to hereinabove.

5. Contempt petition stands disposed off accordingly.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top