SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(RAJ) 1063

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JAIPUR BENCH)
MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA, J
KARAN SAXENA SON OF MAHENDRA NARAYAN SAXENA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
CRLMP / 745 / 2025



Advocates:
Mr. Rajveer Singh Gurjar, Mr. Mrityunjay Sharma, Mr. Amit Punia, PP

Inherent jurisdiction can be exercised to quash non-compoundable offences when parties reach a compromise and public interest is not harmed.

Headnote:(A) Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 498-A and 406 - Criminal misc. petition filed to quash proceedings for offences under sections 498-A and 406 IPC - Compromise reached between parties - Court verified compromise for Section 406 IPC but rejected for Section 498-A as non-compoundable - Court allowed petition based on Supreme Court precedent. (Paras 2-7)

(B) Compromise in criminal cases - The Supreme Court in B.S. Joshi case held that inherent jurisdiction can be exercised in cases where parties have settled disputes, even for non-compoundable offences when no public interest is harmed. (Paras 3-6)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner sought to quash criminal proceedings against him under IPC sections 498-A and 406, citing a compromise agreement with the complainant, who expressed no objection to the quashing.

Findings of Court:
The court found it appropriate to exercise inherent jurisdiction to quash the proceedings based on the compromise and Supreme Court guidance.

Issues: Whether the compromise could lead to quashing of proceedings for a non-compoundable offence.

Ratio Decidendi: The court determined that inherent powers can be exercised in cases with a compromise when it serves justice and public interest is not compromised.

Result: The criminal proceedings were quashed.

Order :

1. The present criminal misc. petition under Section 528 B.N.S.S. has been filed by the petitioner with a prayer to quash and set aside the proceedings of Criminal Case No.249/2021; State vs. Karan Saxena for offence under Section 498-A & 406 of IPC pending before the Court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate Jaipur Metropolitan-I in connection with FIR No.94/2021 registered at Police Station Mahila Thana (East) Jaipur City for the offence under Section 498-A & 406 of IPC .

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the parties have entered into a compromise and submitted a written compromise deed before the learned court below and the court below vide order dated 09.01.2025 attested/verified the compromise as regards the offence under Section 406 IPC , however, rejected the compromise as regards the offence under Section 498-A IPC , observing that same is not compoundable.

3. Counsel for the petitioner has also placed reliance on the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in case of B.S. Joshi and Ors. vs. State of Haryana and Anr. passed in Criminal Appeal No.383/2003 arising out of SLP (Crl.) No.3416/2002 dated 13.03.2003.

4. Learned counsel appearing for the complainant admits the fact of compromise arrived at between the parties. Counsel on the instructions of the complainant submits that the complainant has no objection if criminal proceedings against the petitioner are quashed and set aside.

5. Considered the submissions made at bar and perused the relevant material available on record.

6. Having regard to the submissions made by the counsels appearing for the parties and also the fact of compromise arrived at between the parties as well as the observations made by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of B.S. Joshi (supra), this Court feels that this is a fit case to exercise inherent jurisdiction of this Court provided under Section 528 of B.N.S.S.

7. Accordingly, this criminal misc. petition is allowed and the proceedings of Criminal Case No.249/2021; State vs. Karan Saxena for offence under Section 498-A & 406 of IPC pending before the Court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate Jaipur Metropolitan-I in connection with FIR No.94/2021 registered at Police Station Mahila Thana (East) Jaipur City for the offence under Section 498-A & 406 of IPC , so also the order dated 09.01.2025, are hereby quashed and set aside.

8. Pending application, if any, also stands disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top