SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Raj) 1194

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
MR. JUSTICE FARJAND ALI, J
Irfan S/o Sh. Taaj Mohd - Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan - Respondent
S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 5484/2024
Decided On : 29-01-2025

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Ravi Panwar
For the Respondent: Mr. Vikram Rajpurohit, Dy.G.A Mr. R.S.Bhati, AGA

The court affirmed the right to a fair trial, emphasizing the necessity of judicial oversight in forensic examinations to ensure the integrity of evidence in narcotics cases.

Headnote:

(A) Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Section 52A - Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Section 482 - Forensic examination of seized narcotics - Petitioner challenged the rejection of his application for a fresh sample from seized contraband for forensic analysis - Standing Order No. 1/89 mandates strict guidelines for handling narcotics - The trial court failed to adhere to these protocols, raising concerns about the integrity of the evidence - The court emphasized the right to a fair trial, permitting fresh forensic examination under judicial oversight to ensure the integrity of the prosecution's case. (Paras 4, 12, 17, 27)

(B) Fair trial - The accused is entitled to verify material evidence and seek forensic examination to substantiate his defense - The court highlighted the importance of balancing both the prosecution's case and the defense plea. (Paras 13, 19, 21)

(C) Judicial oversight - The court directed that a fresh sample be drawn under the supervision of a judicial officer to uphold the integrity of the trial process and ensure procedural fairness. (Paras 27, 28)

Facts of the case:
Petitioner was accused of possessing 400 grams of MDMA. He sought a fresh sample for forensic analysis, claiming the original sample might have been substituted. The trial court rejected his application, leading to this petition.

Findings of Court:
The court found no reason to reject the petitioner's request for a fresh forensic examination, asserting it was necessary for ensuring justice and integrity in the trial process.

Issues: The main issues were the integrity of the original sample and the necessity of a fresh forensic examination to uphold the accused's right to a fair trial.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the accused's right to verify evidence is fundamental, and judicial oversight in drawing fresh samples is essential for maintaining the integrity of the trial.

Result: The petition is allowed; the trial court's order is quashed, and a fresh sample is to be taken under judicial supervision.

Order :

1. By way of filing this instant Criminal Misc. Petition under Section 482 CrPC, the petitioner has challenged the order dated 11.12.2023 passed by the learned Special Judge, NDPS Cases, Pratapgarh in Criminal Case No. 11/2023, whereby the learned Judge has rejected the application filed by the petitioner.

2. The gist of the present case is that the petitioner has been arraigned as an accused and arrested in a case under the NDPS Act for the offence under sections 8/22, 25 for having possession of 400 grams MDMA wherein trial had commenced before the learned Special Judge, NDPS Cases, Pratapgarh (for short, “the trial Court”). After seizure the samples were taken from the recovered contraband and sent to the FSL. During the pendency of the trial, the petitioner had moved applications on 28.04.2023 and 27.07.2023, seeking direction for taking sample from the original article lying in maalkhana for forensic examination to bring the true facts on record. However, the learned trial Court, vide order dated 11.12.2023, rejected the said applications and declined to take sample from the remainder article for the purpose of sending the same for forensic analysis. Aggrieved thereby, the petitioner had preferred the present misc. petition.

3. Heard learned counsels present for the parties and gone through the material available on record.

4. As per Standing Order No. 1/89 issued by the Government of India, Ministry of Finance, the seizure process of narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances must follow stringent guidelines to ensure proper handling, disposal, and prevention of theft or substitution. The Standing Order specifically addresses the safe disposal of narcotic substances, including ensuring that substances are not improperly handled or substituted. In the present case, the seizure of the contraband did not adhere to these protocols as outlined in Standing Order No. 1/89.

5. By way of filing the instant Misc. Petition, the petitioner made a prayer that the narcotic substance marked as “Article A” was not properly handled and that the sample sent for chemical examination could have been substituted or improperly stored, therefore, in line with the requirements of Standing Order No. 1/89 and to ensure the integrity of the trial, it is essential that a fresh sample from the remaining 380 grams of the substance be drawn under judicial oversight and sent for forensic analysis to ascertain the authenticity of the recovered contraband.

6. At this stage, it is pertinent to reproduce Section 52A of the NDPS Act, which lays down the procedure for inventory, certification, and disposal of seized narcotic substances.

Section 52A states as follows - 52A. Disposal of seized narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances.—

(1) The Central Government may, having regard to the hazardous nature, vulnerability to theft, substitution, constraint of proper storage space or any other relevant consideration, in respect of any narcotic drugs, psychotropic substances, controlled substances or conveyances, by notification in the Official Gazette, specify such narcotic drugs, psychotropic substances, controlled substances or conveyance or class of narcotic drugs, class of psychotropic substances, class of controlled substances or conveyances, which shall, as soon as may be after their seizure, be disposed of by such officer and in such manner as that Government may, from time to time, determine after following the procedure hereinafter specified.

(2) Where any narcotic drugs, psychotropic substances, controlled substances or conveyances has been seized and forwarded to the officer-in-charge of the nearest police station or to the officer empowered under section 53, the officer referred to in sub- section (1) shall prepare an inventory of such narcotic drugs or psychotropic substances containing such details relating to their description, quality, quantity, mode of packing, marks, numbers or such other identifying particulars of the narcotic drugs or psychotr

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top