Back
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN, J
Bharat Rathore S/o Megh Singh – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Rajasthan – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioners' claims (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 2. court's review of actions (Para 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 3. writ petitions dismissed (Para 25 , 26) |
Judgment :
2. The lead matter in the instant case with the consent of parties is taken as SB Civil Writ Petition No.566/2021 (Bharat Rathore & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.). It is hereby made clear that the ratio passed therein shall be made mutatis mutandis applicable to all the connected petitions.
“i) The impugned actions of the respondents of not picking up further 193 candidates from the revised waiting list dated 16.07.2018 against ineligible candidates and non-joiners against the available vacancies of the advertisement dated 26.07.2013 may kindly be declared illegal and arbitrary and therefore, same may kindly be quashed and set aside in the interest of justice.
a) operate the revised waiting list dated 16.07.2018 against all the non-joiners and ineligible candidates of the advertisement dated 26.07.2013;
4. Brief facts of the case are as follows:
4.2. Thereafter, examination was conducted, and results were declared. Moreover, on the same day, i.e., 07.07.2017, wa
Waiting lists do not confer vested rights for appointment, and recruitment processes can lapse with new selections, as confirmed by the court.
Sub-clause (vi) of Rule 277A of Rules of 1996 read as Authorized Agency shall prepare category wise select list of candidates declared successful on basis of criteria of selection laid down.
The petitioner's claim for appointment on the post of JLO from the reserved waiting list was found to be valid as he approached the Court before the expiry of the wait list, and the Court allowed the....
The waiting list candidates have the right to claim appointment if the candidates from the main list do not join, and the State must provide justifiable, non-arbitrary reasons for not filling up the ....
Point of law: Recruitment - duty of the Public Service Commission is to make available to the Government a complete list of qualified candidates arranged in order of merit. Thereafter the Government ....
Selected candidates do not have an indefeasible right to be appointed, and executive instructions cannot override statutory rules.
The obligation of respondent authorities to consider waiting list candidates for appointment when vacancies remain unfilled from the select list, as per the advertisement clause and legal precedents.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
