Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
ANAND SHARMA
Manju Kumari D/o Shri Harish Chandra – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Education Department – Respondent
ORDER :
ANAND SHARMA, J.
1. By way of filing this writ petition, petitioner has assailed order dated 24.03.2026 passed by the Secretary, Rajasthan Public Service Commission, Ajmer whereby, representation filed by the petitioner in compliance of order dated 16.01.2026 passed by Co- ordinate Bench of this Court in S.B. CWP No. 564/2026 has been dismissed.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that an advertisement was issued by respondent-Commission on 28.04.2022 for inviting applications for recruitment on the post of Lecturer (Political Science). The petitioner being eligible submitted application form and participated in the process. As per petitioner, provisional select list was issued on 04.05.2023 in which, the name of the petitioner was also included and he was allowed in the counseling process. Thereafter, on 29.09.2023 final merit list as well as reserve list issued by Public Commission and petitioner found his name in the reserve list at Serial No. 206. Learned counsel submits that thereafter, appointments were given to the candidates following the main select list on 07.10.2023 however, certain posts were lying vacant despite appointment order given by the responden
The petitioner's claim for appointment on the post of JLO from the reserved waiting list was found to be valid as he approached the Court before the expiry of the wait list, and the Court allowed the....
Sub-clause (vi) of Rule 277A of Rules of 1996 read as Authorized Agency shall prepare category wise select list of candidates declared successful on basis of criteria of selection laid down.
Point of law: Recruitment - duty of the Public Service Commission is to make available to the Government a complete list of qualified candidates arranged in order of merit. Thereafter the Government ....
Waiting lists do not confer vested rights for appointment, and recruitment processes can lapse with new selections, as confirmed by the court.
Waiting list candidates entitled to appointment for vacancies within validity period, tolled by judicial proceedings; cannot be denied arbitrarily.
The court emphasized the obligation to maintain a Reserve Panel for timely appointments, asserting candidates have a legitimate expectation to be considered for unfilled vacancies, as mandated by ear....
The waiting list candidates have the right to claim appointment if the candidates from the main list do not join, and the State must provide justifiable, non-arbitrary reasons for not filling up the ....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
