Back
HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
MR. JUSTICE FARJAND ALI, J
Gajendra Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. accused's contention on flaws (Para 3) |
| 2. complainant's report of assault (Para 6 , 8) |
| 3. court's view on trial delays (Para 7) |
| 4. bail granted to petitioner (Para 9) |
Order
08/01/2025
1. The jurisdiction of this court has been invoked by way of filing the second bail application under Section 439 CrPC at the instance of accused-petitioner. The requisite details of the matter
2. The first bail application of petitioner came to be dismissed by the Coordinate Bench Court vide order 22.04.2024 passed in S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.15117/2023.
3. It is contended on behalf of the accused-petitioner that no case for the alleged offences is made out against him and his incarceration is not warranted. There are several flaws and laches in the case of the prosecution. There are no factors at play in the case at hand that may work against grant of bail to the accused- petitioner and he has been made an accused based on conjectures and surmises.
4. Contrary to the submissions of learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Public Prosecutor opposes the bail application and submits that the present case is not fit for enlargement of accused on bail.
5. I have heard and con
The right to a speedy trial is fundamental, and indefinite detention without trial violates constitutional guarantees, warranting bail.
The right to a speedy trial is fundamental, and indefinite detention without trial violates constitutional guarantees, necessitating bail for accused-petitioners.
The right to a speedy trial is fundamental, and indefinite incarceration without trial violates Article 21 of the Constitution.
An accused's right to a speedy trial is paramount, and prolonged incarceration without trial infringes upon fundamental rights.
Indefinite incarceration without trial violates the right to a speedy trial and the presumption of innocence, necessitating bail under Section 439 CrPC.
The right to a speedy trial is fundamental, and prolonged detention without trial violates the accused's rights, warranting bail.
The right to a speedy trial is fundamental under Article 21, and prolonged incarceration without trial violates this right, warranting the grant of bail.
The right to a speedy trial is fundamental; prolonged detention without trial violates the accused's rights, warranting bail.
The right to a speedy trial is a fundamental right under Article 21, and prolonged detention without trial violates this right.
The right to a speedy trial is fundamental, and prolonged detention without trial violates Article 21 of the Constitution.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
