Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR
SUDESH BANSAL
Poonam Saxena – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
ORDER :
SUDESH BANSAL, J.
1. Heard counsel for the petitioner at length so also the Dy. Government Counsel appearing on behalf of the Department of Secondary Education and perused the record carefully.
2. Matter pertains to claim of petitioner for appointment on the post of PTI Grade-III in District Jalore pursuant to the advertisement dated 28.07.2003, alleging herself to be higher in merit than private respondent No.4, who has been given appointment.
3. The factual matrix, in nutshell as culled out from the record is that:
3.1 In District Jalore, 10 posts of PTI Grade-III (Male) were notified vide advertisement dated 28.07.2003. Out of such 10 posts, on 2 posts, female candidates were to be recruited. In order to fill 2 posts of PTI Grade-III from the female candidates, a list of 10 female candidates was prepared by the respondents according to their merit. The details of respective merit of such 10 female candidates have been made available on record by the petitioner in the form of Schedule-A, appended with the writ petition.
3.2 It is noteworthy herein that this is an undisputed and admitted case by the petitioner as well as by the respondents that both the posts of PTI Grade-III ha
The court upheld the validity of appointments made to candidates who appeared for the interview, emphasizing that failure to participate negates claims based on merit.
The judgment established that a candidate who had secured higher marks could not be deprived of the right to be considered for appointment, and the insufficiency of information imparted was taken as ....
Minor omission of training institute in employment exchange registration does not deny notional regular appointment parity with batchmates when certificate valid and silent on institute; contract app....
The court emphasized that all similarly situated candidates must be treated alike, directing the appointment of the applicant based on Supreme Court guidelines.
The requirement for a certificate of other income prior to appointment was not stipulated in the notification, and thus the tribunal erroneously quashed the selection of the petitioner based on that ....
The appointing authority should provide legally acceptable justifiable reasons for non-appointment of candidates in the waiting list, and the inaction in filling up vacant posts without justifiable r....
Misrepresentation regarding marital status invalidates employment eligibility under applicable decentralized recruitment laws.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
