IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR GARG, J
Mangi Lal S/o Shri Panna Ram Sargara – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
Order :
MANOJ KUMAR GARG, J.
1.Instant criminal revision petition under Section 397 /401 Cr.P.C . has been filed by the petitioner/complainant against the judgment dated 16.06.2006, passed by learned Additional District & Sessions Judge, Sojat, District Pali in Sessions Case No.24/2003, whereby the learned trial court acquitted the accused-respondents No.2 to 4 from the offences punishable under Sections 498-A , 306 IPC.
2. Brief facts of the case are that on 14.07.1999, complainant/petitioner submitted a report before the SP, Pali to the effect that marriage of his daughter Usha solemnized with respondent No.2 Govindram about 6 years ago. After some time of marriage, the accused-respondents No.2 to 4 started harassing the complainant’s daughter for bringing less dowry and also gave beatings to her and subsequently, the accused-respondents No.2 to 4 murdered Usha by giving poison her. On the said complaint, Police registered a case against the accused respondents No.2 to 4 and started investigation.
3. On completion of investigation, the police filed challan against the accused respondent Nos.2 to 4 for offence underSections 498-A, 304-B IPC. Thereafter, the trial court framed the char
An appellate court may only interfere with a judgment of acquittal if compelling reasons exist, maintaining the presumption of innocence unless the trial court's decision is unreasonable or contrary ....
The appellate court should not interfere with an acquittal unless there are compelling reasons, such as a clear misreading of evidence or ignoring material facts.
An appellate court may only interfere with a judgment of acquittal when there are compelling reasons, and the presumption of innocence remains fortified by acquittal.
Acquittals should not be overturned unless compelling reasons are shown; the presumption of innocence is reinforced by an acquittal.
Acquittal judgments require compelling reasons for interference; presumption of innocence is reinforced by acquittal.
An acquittal strengthens the presumption of innocence, and an appellate court can only overturn such a judgment if it finds that the trial court's conclusion was unreasonable or unsupported by eviden....
Interference in acquittal judgments requires compelling reasons; the presumption of innocence must be respected unless the lower court's decision is palpably erroneous.
The court emphasized the high threshold for interfering with acquittal judgments, requiring compelling reasons to overturn a lower court's decision.
The court emphasized that acquittal judgments should not be interfered with unless they are palpably erroneous or contrary to evidence, reinforcing the presumption of innocence.
The court upheld the acquittal of the accused, emphasizing the presumption of innocence and the need for compelling reasons to overturn such judgments.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.