IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
Avneesh Jhingan, Maneesh Sharma, JJ.
Harshvardhan Johari - Appellant
Versus
Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle-03 - Respondent
D.B. Income Tax Appeal No. 48/2020
Decided On : 27-03-2025
(A) Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 153A, 143(2), 37 - Assessment proceedings - The court addressed the relevance of the date of issuance of notice versus the date of search for determining the pendency of proceedings under Section 153A - The appellant's claim for education expenses was disallowed as personal expenses not incurred in the relevant assessment year - The tribunal's findings were upheld. (Paras 7, 8, 20, 21, 28)
(B) Assessment and Reassessment - The court clarified that completed assessments cannot be reopened without incriminating material found during a search, as per Section 153A. (Paras 16, 17)
Facts of the case:
The appellant, an income tax assessee, contested the disallowance of education expenses amounting to Rs.1,11,35,190/- for AY 2010-11, following a search conducted on 05.09.2011. The assessment was finalized on 10.03.2015, and the first appeal was dismissed on 26.05.2017.
Findings of Court:
The court upheld the tribunal's decision that the education expenses were personal and not related to the assessment year in question.
Issues: The main issues included the relevance of the notice date for determining the pendency of proceedings and the validity of the assessment order beyond the normal time limit.
Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the assessment proceedings were pending at the time of the search, and the tribunal's findings regarding the personal nature of the expenses were justified.
Result: Appeal disposed of.
JUDGMENT :
AVNEESH JHINGAN, J.
1. This is an application (I.A. No.1/2024) filed for framing additional substantial question of law.
2. After arguing the application at length, learned counsel for the applicant submits that instead of proposed substantial question of law in the application following additional substantial question of law be admitted:
(i) Whether in the facts of the case to determine the pendency of the proceedings as per Section 153A, the date of issuance of notice would be relevant or date of search?
3. Learned counsel for the non-applicant could not raise any serious objection to the acceptance of the prayer.
4. The substantial question of law framed here in above shall be considered while deciding the appeal.
5. The application is allowed.
6. This appeal is filed against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Jaipur (for short ‘the tribunal’) dated 11.03.2020 relating to assessment year (for brevity ‘AY’) 2010-11.
7. In this appeal, following substantial questions of law have been formulated:-
“(i) Whether in the facts of the case to determine the pendency of the proceedings as per Section 153A’ the date of issuance of notice would be relevant or date of search?
(ii) Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case the assessment order of the Appellant, for Assessment year 2010-11, framed on 10.03.2016, one year beyond the normal time-limit, in view of Explanation of Section 153B, was not barred by time limitation, hence invalid, since the reference allegedly made under section 90 of the Income-Tax Act was illegal, without jurisdiction, without statutory authority, and void ab initio?
(iii) Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case the ITAT erred in law in holding that the expenses on education of the Appellant were personal expenses, having been incurred prior to setting up on business, totally ignoring evidence on record that the business of the Appellant had commenced in the financial year 2008-09 and return showing substantial turnover, gross profit and taxable income had been filed right from Assessment year 2009-10 onwards?”
8. The brief facts are that appellant is an income tax assessee. On 05.09.2011 search was conducted at the residence and business premises of the appellant. On 10.10.2010, appellant filed income tax returns for AY 2010-11. Notice dated 14.09.2012 was issued under Section 153-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short ‘the Act’) and the assessment was finalised on 10.03.2015, disallowing the education expenses to the tune of Rs.1,11,35,190/-. The first appeal was dismissed on 26.05.2017. The appellant being unsuccessful in the tribunal is before this court.
Substantial question of law No.1
9. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that assessment proceedings for AY 2010-11 were complete as no notice was issued under section 143(2) of the Act. Addition under section 153-A in completed assessment was wrongly made without there being incriminating material seized during the search.
10. Learned counsel for the revenue submits that before expiry of time to issue notice under section 143(2), the search was conducted on 05.09.2011 when the proceedings were pending.
11. From Section 143(2) and the proviso thereto, the position merges that the Assessing Officer (A.O.), if considers expedient to verify that there is no understated income or excess loss computed or that there is underpayment of tax, shall serve a notice on the assessee to produce the evidence to support the return.
The proviso prescribes that notice cannot be issued after expiry of six months from the end of the financial year in which return is furnished.
12. The relevant provisions of Section 153-A of the Act is quoted below:-
“Assessment in case of search or requisition.
153A. (1) Notwithstanding anything contained in section 139, section 147, section 148, section 149, section 151 and section 153, in the case of a person where a search is initiated under section 132 or books of account, other documents or any assets are req
Completed assessments cannot be reopened without incriminating material found during a search, as per Section 153A of the Income Tax Act.
Reassessment notice under Section 148 invalid due to exceeding statutory limitation for assessment years prior to April 2021, breaching prescribed timelines under Income Tax Act.
The legal position that emerges from the decisions and the Supreme Court's approval of the view taken by the Delhi High Court in the case of Kabul Chawla.
Scope of assessment – No addition can be made in respect of completed assessments in absence of any incriminating material.
The court held that in cases of search under Section 132, the provisions of Section 153A apply mandatorily, overriding Section 147 and 148, unless incriminating material is found.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that additions under Section 153A of the Income Tax Act cannot be made without incriminating material gathered during the search, and completed ass....
Reassessment notices issued beyond statutory time limits are invalid; the Income Tax Act specifies clear time frames for such actions based on search operations.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.