Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
ASHUTOSH KUMAR
Buddhiprakash Son of Ummedmal – Appellant
Versus
Shubham @ Golu Rathore Son of Shayamswaroop Rathore – Respondent
ORDER :
Ashutosh Kumar, J.
1- nkokdrkZ@vihykFkhZx.k ¼ftUgsa vkxs ^nkokdrkZx.k* ds uke ls lacksf/kr fd;k tk,xk½ dh vksj ls izLrqr vihy la[;k&3629@2022 ,oa jsLiksaMsaV@vihykaV chek dEiuh dh vksj ls izLrqr vihy la[;k&2794@2022] nksuksa nhokuh fofo/k vihysa /kkjk&173 eksVj okgu vf/kfu;e&1988 ds vUrxZr U;k;ky; eksVj;ku nq?kZVuk nkok vf/kdj.k] ckjka ¼jkt-½ ¼ftls vkxs ^vf/kdj.k* ds uke ls lacksf/kr fd;k tk,xk½ }kjk Dyse ;kfpdk la[;k&74@2019] cqf)izdk'k o vU; cuke 'kqHke mQZ xksyw o vU; esa ikfjr fu.kZ; fnukad 29-07-2022 ¼ftls vkxs ^vk{ksfir fu.kZ;* ds uke ls lacksf/kr fd;k tk,xk½ ds fo#) izLrqr dh xbZ gSA ftudk fuLrkj.k lqfo/kk dh n`f"V ls bl ,d fu.kZ; ds }kjk fd;k tk jgk gSA
2- nkokdrkZx.k }kjk vf/kdj.k ds le{k] mes'k 'kekZ dh eksVj okgu nq?kZVuk esa e`R;q gks tkus ds QyLo:i 1]36]37]000@& #i;s Dyse izkIr djus gsrq Dyse ;kfpdk izLrqr dh xbZ FkhA vf/kdj.k }kjk mDr Dyse ;kfpdk esa ;kphx.k dks dqy 23]38]000@& #i;s dh {kfriwfrZ jkf'k e; C;kt 06 izfr'kr lkykuk dh nj ls fnyokbZ x;h gSA mDr vk{ksfir fu.kZ; ls O;fFkr gksdj gLrxr vihy] nkokdrkZx.k dh vksj ls vihy la[;k&3629@2022 {kfriwfrZ jkf'k esa cढ+ksrjh fd;s tkus grsq rFkk jsLiksaMsaV@vihykaV chek daiuh dh vksj ls izLrqr vihy la[;k&2794@2022 vf/k
The court established that statutory documents must be prioritized for age determination in compensation claims, ensuring just compensation for claimants.
Compensation for death in motor accidents must be just and reasonable, prioritizing statutory documents for age determination.
Compensation for vehicular accidents must reflect actual loss and income of the deceased, ensuring fairness and justice in the award.
The court established that compensation for death in a motor accident must be just and reasonable, prioritizing minimum wage rates for income determination.
Compensation in motor vehicle accidents must prioritize statutory documents for age determination and ensure just and reasonable amounts, with appellate courts limited in their interference.
Claims under the Motor Vehicles Act must be substantiated with adequate evidence and comply with procedural requirements to be valid.
The court established that compensation for the death of a minor must reflect potential economic contributions, applying a notional income and appropriate multiplier.
The principles of just compensation and the need to fully restore the aggrieved to their pre-accident position under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
